Literature DB >> 9125027

Effects of pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide, argon, or helium on hemodynamic and respiratory function.

T Junghans1, B Böhm, K Gründel, W Schwenk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide, argon, and helium; different abdominal pressures (ie, 8, 12, and 16 mm Hg); and different positions (ie, head up, head down, supine) on hemodynamic and respiratory function in a porcine model.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial.
SETTING: Animal research laboratory. ANIMALS: Eighteen pigs weighing 25.5 +/- 6.9 kg (mean +/- SD).
INTERVENTIONS: General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Implantation of pulmonal artery catheter and central venous line in jugular vein and catheters in femoral artery and vein. Carbon dioxide, argon, or helium was insufflated through a cannula in the left upper quadrant. The type of gas was randomly assigned to each animal. After recording baseline values at the beginning and at the end without pneumoperitoneum, each animal was placed in 1 of the 3 positions and under 1 of the 3 pressures kept by the insufflator. After 15 minutes of adaptation to the new circumstances, all factors were recorded. This procedure was repeated until all 9 combinations of pressures and positions were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiac output; heart rate; stroke volume; right ventricular stroke work; pressures in the pulmonal artery, vena cava, and femoral artery and vein; systemic vascular resistance; respiratory pressure; tidal volume; pH; base excess; oxygen partial pressure; and carbon dioxide partial pressure.
RESULTS: The type of gas did not affect cardiac output. Only carbon dioxide demonstrated negative effects on respiratory function. Argon markedly increased afterload. Carbon dioxide increased central venous and mean arterial pressure, which was only moderate using helium. A head-up position decreased cardiac output and central venous pressure and increased mean arterial and peripheral venous pressures, which were partly compensated in a head-down position. An intraperitoneal pressure of 16 mm Hg increased peripheral and central venous pressures, heart rate, and respiratory pressure, and decreased cardiac output, tidal volume, and pH.
CONCLUSIONS: Helium may be an alternative gas to establish pneumoperitoneum because it does not have any effect on respiratory function and has only a moderate effect on hemodynamic function. Argon insufflation has some hemodynamic disadvantages. An intraperitoneal pressure greater than 12 mm Hg and a head-up position should be avoided because both have a markedly negative effect on respiratory and hemodynamic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9125027     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430270058012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  15 in total

1.  Effects of continuous negative extra-abdominal pressure on cardiorespiratory function during abdominal hypertension: an experimental study.

Authors:  Franco Valenza; Manuela Irace; Massimiliano Guglielmi; Stefano Gatti; Nicola Bottino; Cecilia Tedesco; Micol Maffioletti; Patrizia Maccagni; Tommaso Fossali; Gabriele Aletti; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Systematic evaluation of different approaches for minimizing hemodynamic changes during pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  T Junghans; D Modersohn; F Dörner; J Neudecker; O Haase; W Schwenk
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of impacts of intraperitoneal saline instillation with and without pulmonary recruitment maneuver on post-laparoscopic shoulder pain prevention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kyoung-Ho Ryu; Sung Hyun Lee; Eun-Ah Cho; Ji-A Kim; Go-Eun Lim; Taejong Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A new method of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  U Maestroni; D Sortini; C Devito; F Pour Morad Kohan Brunaldi; G Anania; L Pavanelli; A Pasqualucci; A Donini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Hypovolemia after traditional preoperative care in patients undergoing colonic surgery is underrepresented in conventional hemodynamic monitoring.

Authors:  Tido Junghans; Heiko Neuss; Michael Strohauer; Wieland Raue; Oliver Haase; Tania Schink; Wolfgang Schwenk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Different anesthesia methods for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  X Liu; C Wei; Z Wang; H Wang
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during helium pneumoperitoneum: The mechanism of increased cardiac sympathetic activity and its clinical significance.

Authors:  A Bickel; E Kukuev; O Popov; S Ivry; N Roguin; M Yahalom; A Eitan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Absorption of carbon dioxide during endoscopic vein harvest.

Authors:  Carlo Zingaro; Michele Danilo Pierri; Francesco Massi; Marco Luciano Sacha Matteucci; Filippo Capestro; Alessandro D'Alfonso; Carlo Aratari; Lucia Torracca
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-02

9.  Effect of intraabdominal pressure elevation and positioning on hemodynamic responses during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective controlled clinical study.

Authors:  I R A M Mertens zur Borg; A Lim; S J C Verbrugge; J N M IJzermans; J Klein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of a standard CO₂ pressure pneumoperitoneum insufflator versus AirSeal: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ruzica Rosalia Luketina; Michael Knauer; Gernot Köhler; Oliver Owen Koch; Klaus Strasser; Margot Egger; Klaus Emmanuel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.