Literature DB >> 9125019

Heller myotomy is superior to dilatation for the treatment of early achalasia.

M Anselmino1, G Perdikis, R A Hinder, P V Polishuk, P Wilson, J D Terry, S J Lanspa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the pretreatment characteristics that predispose a patient to rupture and to compare the outcome after dilatation with the outcome after surgical myotomy.
DESIGN: A survey of all patients treated for achalasia at the Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, Neb, during a 16-year period. Clinical examination and testing of consenting patients at 12 months and longer after treatment.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Of the 61 patients, 55 were treated with dilatation. Esophageal rupture developed in 8 patients (14.5%) with achalasia after pneumatic dilatation; these patients underwent surgery for the rupture. Dilatation failed in 8 other patients; these patients underwent a surgical myotomy. Six patients underwent a primary surgical myotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Duration of symptoms, weight loss, lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure and relaxation, amplitude and quality of distal esophageal contractions (assessed by manometry), 24-hour esophageal pH, and maximal esophageal diameter (assessed by barium swallow examination).
RESULTS: Surgical myotomy at a mean (+/-SEM) of 44.9 +/- 18.6 months alleviated dysphagia in 13 (93%) of the 14 patients compared with only 12 (39%) of the 31 patients after dilatation at a mean (+/-SEM) of 55.0 +/- 11.7 months (P < .001). Of the 14 patients who underwent surgical myotomy, 13 (93%) were able to return to a normal diet compared with only 2 (7%) of the 31 patients who underwent dilatation (P < .001). Compared with patients without perforations, patients with perforations after pneumatic dilatation had pretreatment characteristics consistent with "early" disease: shorter symptom duration (20.1 +/- 5.4 vs 68.9 +/- 4.9 months, P < .001), less weight loss (4.7 +/- 1.2 vs 10.3 +/- 0.8 kg, P < .001), a less dilated esophagus (24.0 +/- 1.8 vs 45.6 +/- 3.0 mm, P < .005), lower lower esophageal sphincter resting pressures (19.3 +/- 2.6 vs 34.2 +/- 1.3 mm Hg, P < .001), a greater percentage of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (47.6% +/- 4.9% vs 20.7% +/- 2.1%, P < .001), and a lower percentage of synchronous contractions in the distal esophageal body (66.2% +/- 4.9% vs 85.3% +/- 2.3%, P < .005). (All data given as the mean [+/-SEM].) All patients with pneumatic perforations were successfully treated by thoracotomy and surgical repair.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical myotomy provides a better long-term outcome. The early disease stage is associated with perforation after pneumatic dilatation. Surgical myotomy rather than balloon dilatation should be considered in patients with early achalasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9125019     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430270019002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  17 in total

Review 1.  Achalasia of the cardia: dilatation or division? The case for balloon dilatation.

Authors:  P J Lamb; S M Griffin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Esophagectomy for end stage achalasia.

Authors:  Stephen M Glatz; J David Richardson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Esophagus-Related Symptoms in First-Degree Relatives of Patients with Achalasia: Is Screening Necessary?

Authors:  Henning R Gockel; Moritz Lesse; Johannes Schumacher; Michaela Müller; Ines Gockel
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-08-17

4.  A total fundoplication is not an obstacle to esophageal emptying after heller myotomy for achalasia: results of a long-term follow up.

Authors:  Gianluca Rossetti; Luigi Brusciano; Giuseppe Amato; Vincenzo Maffettone; Vincenzo Napolitano; Gianluca Russo; Domenico Izzo; Federica Russo; Francesco Pizza; Gianmattia Del Genio; Alberto Del Genio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic calibrated total vs partial fundoplication following Heller myotomy for oesophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Natale Di Martino; Antonio Brillantino; Luigi Monaco; Luigi Marano; Michele Schettino; Raffaele Porfidia; Giuseppe Izzo; Angelo Cosenza
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Major complications of pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy for achalasia: single-center experience and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristle L Lynch; John E Pandolfino; Colin W Howden; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  The cost of laparoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilatation for esophageal achalasia.

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Shona E Smith; Richard I Inculet; Richard A Malthaner; Richard P Reynolds; Ron Goeree; Amiram Gafni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for achalasia.

Authors:  J Barry O'Connor; Mendel E Singer; Thomas F Imperiale; Michael F Vaezi; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Laparoscopic oesophageal cardiomyotomy without fundoplication in children with achalasia: a 10-year experience: a retrospective review of the results of laparoscopic oesophageal cardiomyotomy without an anti-reflux procedure in children with achalasia.

Authors:  Larisa Corda; Maurizio Pacilli; Simon Clarke; John M Fell; David Rawat; Munther Haddad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  [Treatment of achalasia].

Authors:  Enrico P Cosentini; Etienne Wenzl; Raimund Jakesz
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2004-05-31       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.