Literature DB >> 9124832

Lymphocyte proliferative response and subset profiles during extended periods of chloroquine or primaquine prophylaxis.

D J Fryauff1, A L Richards, J K Baird, T L Richie, E Mouzin, E Tjitra, M A Sutamihardja, S Ratiwayanto, H Hadiputranto, R P Larasati, N Pudjoprawoto, B Subianto, S L Hoffman.   

Abstract

Immune suppression and disturbances of normal leukocyte populations are side effects attributed to many antimalarial drugs and were concerns during a recent year-long placebo-controlled trial that compared daily primaquine (0.5 mg of base per kg of body weight per day) with weekly chloroquine (300 mg of base one time per week) for malaria prophylaxis. The study took place in Irian Jaya, Indonesia, from July 1994 to August 1995 and enrolled 129 Javanese men with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase function. Tests for lymphocyte function and subset composition were conducted blindly on a cross-section of subjects during weeks 10 (n = 42) and 48 (n = 72) of supervised prophylaxis. Lymphocyte function, measured as the proliferative response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to a panel of mitogens (pokeweed mitogen, phytohemagglutinin, and concanavalin A) and antigens (purified protein derivative of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Clostridium tetani toxoid) and expressed as a stimulation index, allowed for statistical comparison between groups and sampling times. The lymphocyte subset composition for each group and time point was based on flow cytometry profiling, and the results were expressed as the mean percentages of CD3 (total T cells), CD19 (total B cells), CD4+ (T-helper and inducer cells), and CD8+ (T suppressor and cytotoxic cells), CD3/CD16+ CD56 (natural killer cells), CD3/anti-HLA-DR (activated T cells) cells and the CD4+/CD8+ ratios. Lymphocyte stimulation indices were statistically comparable among the placebo, primaquine, and chloroquine groups at both time points, although the primaquine group was distinguished by having repeatedly greater proportions of subjects with high ( > 3.0) stimulation indices. The lymphocyte subset profiles of these groups at both time points were also similar and undistorted relative to those of healthy reference populations matched for age, sex, and ethnicity. The results provide quantitative support for the safety of daily primaquine prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9124832      PMCID: PMC163613     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  13 in total

1.  SUPPRESSION OF IN VITRO LYMPHOCYTE RESPONSES BY CHLOROQUINE.

Authors:  D HURVITZ; K HIRSCHHORN
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1965-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Pharmacokinetics of primaquine in man. II. Comparison of acute vs chronic dosage in Thai subjects.

Authors:  S A Ward; G W Mihaly; G Edwards; S Looareesuwan; R E Phillips; P Chanthavanich; D A Warrell; M L Orme; A M Breckenridge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Primaquine inhibits mitogen-induced human lymphocyte proliferative responses.

Authors:  Y H Thong; A Ferrante; B Rowan-Kelly
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.184

4.  Randomised placebo-controlled trial of primaquine for prophylaxis of falciparum and vivax malaria.

Authors:  D J Fryauff; J K Baird; H Basri; I Sumawinata; T L Richie; C K Ohrt; E Mouzin; C J Church; A L Richards
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-11-04       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Clinical problems associated with the use of primaquine as a tissue schizontocidal and gametocytocidal drug.

Authors:  D F Clyde
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Pharmacokinetics of primaquine in man: identification of the carboxylic acid derivative as a major plasma metabolite.

Authors:  G W Mihaly; S A Ward; G Edwards; M L Orme; A M Breckenridge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Biotransformation of primaquine in vitro with human K562 and bone marrow cells.

Authors:  H Frischer; T Ahmad; M V Nora; P E Carson; M Sivarajan; R Mellovitz; L Ptak; G W Parkhurst; H S Chow; H Kaizer
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1987-04

8.  Daily primaquine is effective for prophylaxis against falciparum malaria in Kenya: comparison with mefloquine, doxycycline, and chloroquine plus proguanil.

Authors:  W R Weiss; A J Oloo; A Johnson; D Koech; S L Hoffman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Immunosuppressive potential of antimalarials.

Authors:  G Salmeron; P E Lipsky
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-07-18       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Primaquine for prophylaxis against malaria among nonimmune transmigrants in Irian Jaya, Indonesia.

Authors:  J K Baird; D J Fryauff; H Basri; M J Bangs; B Subianto; I Wiady; B Leksana; S Masbar; T L Richie
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.345

View more
  2 in total

1.  Voltage-dependent biphasic effects of chloroquine on delayed rectifier K(+)-channel currents in murine thymocytes.

Authors:  I Kazama; Y Maruyama; Y Murata; M Sano
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.781

Review 2.  Therapy and pharmacological properties of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and related diseases.

Authors:  K D Rainsford; Ann L Parke; Matthew Clifford-Rashotte; W F Kean
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 5.093

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.