Literature DB >> 9123733

The role of color Doppler and staging biopsies in prostate cancer detection.

R L Bree1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the current published data on the role of color Doppler sonography and sonographically-guided staging biopsies in the detection and staging of prostate cancer. This article also discusses the role of color Doppler sonography in defining the ideal patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: Peer-reviewed reports in the radiologic, urologic, and medical literature were reviewed. Data from our own institution served as illustrative material.
RESULTS: Color Doppler sonography using state of the art ultrasound equipment produced from the mid 1990s onward can define areas of hypervascularity in the prostate. When located in the peripheral zone and associated with definable lesions, these areas likely represent carcinoma. More importantly, when isoechoic areas contain hypervascular foci with chaotic flow, cancer is also likely. In 93% of sites that contain normal vascularity, prostate cancer was not detected by biopsy. Staging biopsies are not frequently performed in current clinical practice. A positive seminal vesicle biopsy is associated with capsular penetration in 100% and positive lymph nodes in 50% of patients with prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Color Doppler sonography and staging biopsies may have a more significant role as newer alternative therapies for prostate cancer become popular. These two techniques show promise for increasing the accuracy of pretreatment staging over current algorithms, which are less than adequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9123733     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00166-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

1.  Endorectal multiparametric 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging associated with systematic cognitive biopsies does not increase prostate cancer detection rate: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Giorgio Bozzini; Fabio Grizzi; Mauro Seveso; Alberto Mandressi; Luca Balzarini; Federica Mrakic; Pietro Bono; Oliviero De Franceco; NicolòMaria Buffi; Giovanni Lughezzani; Massimo Lazzeri; Paolo Casale; Giorgio Ferruccio Guazzoni
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Contrast specific imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hessel Wijkstra; Margot H Wink; Jean J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Clinical evaluation of transrectal power doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masahiko Inahara; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Hiroshi Nakamachi; Naoto Kamiya; Masaki Shimbo; Akira Komiya; Takeshi Ueda; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Koichiro Akakura; Haruo Ito
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Ultrasound of prostate cancer: recent advances.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Alexandre Pelzer; Georg Bartsch; Hannes Strasser; Germar M Pinggera; Friedrich Aigner; Johann Gradl; Dieter Zur Nedden; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.