Literature DB >> 912282

Mothers' experiences of induction.

A Cartwright.   

Abstract

Mothers of a random sample of 2182 legitimate live births were interviewed about their experiences of pregnancy, labour, and delivery. Of these, 24% reported that their labours were induced, and data about this from a subsample of mothers tallied with information obtained through the doctors in charge in 88% of cases. All but 3% of the mothers who were induced perceived some medical reason for the induction. The proportion of inductions in the 24 study areas ranged from 6% to 39%. A relatively small proportion of labours in "teaching" hospitals, small hospitals with less than 100 beds, and GP maternity hospitals were induced, but a comparatively high proportion of private patients had an induction. There was no clear association between induction and the mother's age or parity. Despite being given more pain relief, those who were induced reported similar intensities of pain during the first and second stages of labour to those whose labour started spontaneously; they also reported that they had "bad pains" for a similar period. The period they had contractions was shorter for the induced than for those starting spontaneously, and the intensity of pain at delivery was rated somewhat less by those who were induced.There was no difference between induced babies and others in the proportion who were held by their mothers immediately after their birth. Two-fifths of the mothers who were induced would have liked more information about induction; and a similar proportion said they had not discussed induction with a doctor, midwife, or nurse during their pregnancy. Only 17% of the mothers who had an induction said they would prefer to be induced if they had another baby. This contrasts with 63% of those who had epidural analgesia who would opt for the same procedure next time, while 83% of those who had had a baby in hospital, and 91% of those having had a home birth, would want their next baby in the same type of place.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 912282      PMCID: PMC1632080          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.6089.745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  10 in total

1.  The evolution of modern obstetrics.

Authors:  D BAIRD
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1960-09-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Evaluation of different approaches to obstetric care: Part II.

Authors:  I Chalmers; J G Lawson; A C Turnbull
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1976-12

3.  Letter: Induction of labour and perinatal mortality.

Authors:  R H Tipton; B V Lewis
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-02-15

4.  Obstetric practice in the Oxford Record Linkage Study Area 1965-72.

Authors:  J Fedrick; P Yudkin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-03-27

5.  Problems in assessing effects of induction of labour on perinatal mortality.

Authors:  P Yudkin
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1976-08

6.  Towards easier childbirth.

Authors:  P A Walker; R H Martin; J Higginbottom
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Perinatal deaths: analysis by clinical cause to assess value of induction of labour.

Authors:  M B McNay; G M McIlwaine; P W Howie; M C Macnaughton
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-02-05

8.  Letter: Patient response to induction of labour.

Authors:  B V Lewis; S Rana; E Crook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Obstetric delivery today. For better or for worse?

Authors:  P M Dunn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Elective induction of labour. A randomised prospective trial.

Authors:  R A Cole; P W Howie; M C Macnaughton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Variations in number of births and perinatal mortality by day of week in England and Wales.

Authors:  A MacFarlane
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-12-16

Review 2.  Factors that influence the practice of elective induction of labor: what does the evidence tell us?

Authors:  Jennifer Moore; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.638

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.