Literature DB >> 9122425

Increased survival with beta-blockers: importance of ancillary properties.

J B Soriano1, A W Hoes, L Meems, D E Grobbee.   

Abstract

To assess the relative importance of ancillary properties (ie, intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), beta 1-selectivity, membrane stabilizing activity, and lipophilicity) in the effect of beta-blockers on mortality, a meta-analysis of all available secondary and primary prevention trials was performed. Seventy-one trials evaluating the effect on mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) were identified. The overall relative risk (RR) of mortality during beta-blocker treatment versus placebo was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.93), with a trend according to time of intervention: very early intervention RR 0.94 (95% CI 0.87-1.01), early intervention RR 0.91 (95% CI 0.81-1.01), and late intervention RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.73-0.88). Results were similar or even more marked for the end points one-week mortality, reinfarction, and sudden death. beta 1-selectivity, lipophilicity, absence of membrane stabilizing property, and absence of ISA were associated with a greater risk reduction compared with beta-blockers with the opposite ancillary property. When the effect of the three most frequently used beta-blocking drugs (atenolol, metoprolol, and propranolol) were compared, the drug with the combination of ancillary properties showing the most pronounced beneficial effects (metoprolol) had the most marked effect on survival. A similar trend was observed when the five published primary prevention trials comparing beta-blockers and diuretics in patients with hypertension were considered, but the number of studies was too low to allow for definite conclusions. We conclude that beta-blockade after MI leads to a substantial reduction in mortality. The so-called 'class-effect' of beta-blockers, however, can be questioned, because ancillary properties appear to play an important role in the efficacy of these drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9122425     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-0620(97)80039-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 0033-0620            Impact factor:   8.194


  13 in total

Review 1.  Old antihypertensive agents-diuretics and beta-blockers: do we know how and in whom they lower blood pressure?

Authors:  D A Sica
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Beta-adrenergic blocking drugs as antifibrillatory agents.

Authors:  Michael J Reiter
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  [Strategies for perioperative sympatho-modulation].

Authors:  J Wacker; T Pasch; M C Schaub; M Zaugg
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Comparison of the affinity of beta-blockers for two states of the beta 1-adrenoceptor in ferret ventricular myocardium.

Authors:  Martin D Lowe; James A Lynham; Andrew A Grace; Alberto J Kaumann
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Characterization of beta(1)-selectivity, adrenoceptor-G(s)-protein interaction and inverse agonism of nebivolol in human myocardium.

Authors:  C Maack; S Tyroller; P Schnabel; B Cremers; E Dabew; M Südkamp; M Böhm
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Clinical problem solving based on the 1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension.

Authors:  R D Feldman; N R Campbell; P Larochelle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  1999 Canadian recommendations for the management of hypertension. Task Force for the Development of the 1999 Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  R D Feldman; N Campbell; P Larochelle; P Bolli; E D Burgess; S G Carruthers; J S Floras; R B Haynes; G Honos; F H Leenen; L A Leiter; A G Logan; M G Myers; J D Spence; K B Zarnke
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Different intrinsic activities of bucindolol, carvedilol and metoprolol in human failing myocardium.

Authors:  C Maack; B Cremers; M Flesch; A Höper; M Südkamp; M Böhm
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 9.  A composite screening tool for medication reviews of outpatients: general issues with specific examples.

Authors:  Peter A G M De Smet; Wilma Denneboom; Cees Kramers; Richard Grol
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Atenolol is inferior to metoprolol in improving left ventricular function and preventing ventricular remodeling in dogs with heart failure.

Authors:  Valerio Zacà; Sharad Rastogi; Sudhish Mishra; Mengjun Wang; Victor G Sharov; Ramesh C Gupta; Sidney Goldstein; Hani N Sabbah
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 1.869

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.