Literature DB >> 9122395

First-trimester US parameters of failed pregnancy.

S E Rowling1, B G Coleman, J E Langer, P H Arger, H L Nisenbaum, S C Horii.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the reliability of established ultrasound (US) parameters in predicting the outcome of first-trimester pregnancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed 2,655 first-trimester US scans in 2,285 patients. Parameters tested against outcome were (a) a yolk sac and mean gestational sac diameter of 8 mm on transvaginal US scans, (b) an embryo and mean sac diameter of 16 mm on transvaginal US scans, and (c) a difference between the mean sac diameter and crown-rump length of less than 5 mm (oligohydramnios) at 5.5-9.0 weeks gestation.
RESULTS: Thirty (22%) of 135 patients without yolk sacs and with an 8-mm mean sac diameter developed live embryos: 24 had normal follow-up or delivery; six were lost to follow-up. Five (8%) of 59 patients with no depiction of embryos and with a 16-mm mean sac diameter developed live embryos: Two delivered, one spontaneously aborted, one had death of one twin embryo before being lost to follow-up, and one was lost to follow-up. Seventeen (0.74%) of 2,285 patients had early oligohydramnios: Six (35%) had normal follow-up scans or delivery, two (12%) spontaneously aborted, and nine (53%) were lost to follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Established parameters predictive of early pregnancy failure potentially result in misdiagnosis of nonviability or poor prognosis when applied to a large, unselected patient population. Close follow-up is necessary in cases with borderline abnormal findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9122395     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Difference between mean gestational sac diameter and crown-rump length as a marker of first-trimester pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Joshua D Kapfhamer; Sruthi Palaniappan; Karen Summers; Kristen Kassel; Abigail C Mancuso; Ginny L Ryan; Divya K Shah
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Re-examining Sonographic Cut-off Values for Diagnosing Early Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Jennifer Bickhaus; Erin Perry; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale)       Date:  2013

3.  Management of first trimester pregnancy loss can be safely moved into the office.

Authors:  Jana L Allison; Rebecca S Sherwood; Danny J Schust
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011

4.  Factors related to successful misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure.

Authors:  Mitchell D Creinin; Xiangke Huang; Carolyn Westhoff; Kurt Barnhart; Jerry M Gilles; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Diagnostic Methods of Ectopic Pregnancy and Early Pregnancy Loss: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  A Hamza; G Meyberg-Solomayer; I Juhasz-Böss; R Joukhadar; Z Takacs; E-F Solomayer; S Baum; J Radosa; L Mavrova; D Herr
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  A randomized trial of saline solution-moistened misoprostol versus dry misoprostol for first-trimester pregnancy failure.

Authors:  Jerry M Gilles; Mitchell D Creinin; Kurt Barnhart; Carolyn Westhoff; Margaret M Frederick; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study.

Authors:  Jessica Preisler; Julia Kopeika; Laure Ismail; Veluppillai Vathanan; Jessica Farren; Yazan Abdallah; Parijat Battacharjee; Caroline Van Holsbeke; Cecilia Bottomley; Deborah Gould; Susanne Johnson; Catriona Stalder; Ben Van Calster; Judith Hamilton; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.