Literature DB >> 9122385

Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features.

J Y Lo1, J A Baker, P J Kornguth, J D Iglehart, C E Floyd.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether an artificial neural network (ANN) can predict breast cancer invasion on the basis of readily available medical findings (ie, mammographic findings classified according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System and patient age).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 254 adult patients, 266 lesions that had been sampled at biopsy were randomly selected for the study. There were 96 malignant and 170 benign lesions. On the basis of nine mammographic findings and patient age, a three-layer backpropagation network was developed to predict whether the malignant lesions were in situ or invasive.
RESULTS: The ANN predicted invasion among malignant lesions with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) of .91 +/- .03. It correctly identified all 28 in situ cancers (specificity, 100%) and 48 of 68 invasive cancers (sensitivity, 71%).
CONCLUSION: The ANN used mammographic features and patient age to accurately classify invasion among breast cancers, information that was previously available only by means of biopsy. This knowledge may assist in surgical planning and may help reduce the cost and morbidity of unnecessary biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9122385     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  New statistical learning theory paradigms adapted to breast cancer diagnosis/classification using image and non-image clinical data.

Authors:  Walker H Land; John J Heine; Tom Raway; Alda Mizaku; Nataliya Kovalchuk; Jack Y Yang; Mary Qu Yang
Journal:  Int J Funct Inform Personal Med       Date:  2008-01

Review 2.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Quantifying predictive capability of electronic health records for the most harmful breast cancer.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Jun Fan; Peggy Peissig; Richard Berg; Ahmad Pahlavan Tafti; Jie Yin; Ming Yuan; David Page; Jennifer Cox; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2018-03-07

4.  Computer-aided diagnostic models in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Turgay Ayer; Mehmet Us Ayvaci; Ze Xiu Liu; Oguzhan Alagoz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2010-06-01

5.  Predicting invasive breast cancer versus DCIS in different age groups.

Authors:  Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Oguzhan Alagoz; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; Edward A Sickles; Houssam Nassif; Karla Kerlikowske; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.