Literature DB >> 9121995

Rounded biphasic waveform reduces energy requirements for transvenous catheter cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter.

M T Harbinson1, J D Allen, Z Imam, G Dempsey, J M Anderson, G M Ayers, A A Adgey.   

Abstract

We postulated that reducing peak leading edge shock voltage and its rate of rise (waveform rounding) would reduce energy requirements for cardioversion of AF and AFl, and may therefore reduce patient discomfort. Transvenous defibrillating catheters (In-Control Inc.) were placed in the RAA (active fixation) and the CS of six anesthetized sheep. AF or AFl was induced by electrical stimulation (100 Hz, 2 V; Grass stimulator). A standard trapezoidal biphasic (S) waveform (3-ms duration each phase) was compared with a similar waveform that had the first phase rounded (R). Cardioversion was attempted after 30 seconds of arrhythmia, using a Ventritex HVS-O2 defibrillator modified to allow waveform rounding. Each waveform was randomly tested several times at 100-, 150-, and 200-V leading edges, and percentage cardioversion success calculated. Shock energy was calculated from delivered current and voltage using Flukeview (Fluke, Inc.) software. At 100-V leading edge R (64% success) and S (59%), shocks were similarly efficacious (P = 0.37). However, R delivered less current, voltage, and energy than the comparable S shock (means 1.30 A, 65.0 V, 0.33 J R vs 1.92 A, 94.2 V, 0.47 J S; P = 0.0001). Both waveforms were equally successful at 150 V (88% vs 100%; P = NS) and 200 V (100% vs 100%), but again R delivered less current, voltage, and energy (2.05 A, 102.5 V, 0.82 J R vs 2.78 A, 142.3 V, 1.11 J S at 150 V; 2.76 A, 141.2 V, 1.58 J R vs 3.77 A, 189.4 V, 2.03 J S at 200 V; both P = 0.0001). No arrhythmic or other complications occurred in the 174 shocks delivered. Waveform rounding reduces delivered peak voltage, current, and energy without reducing defibrillation efficacy. To determine if these changes are associated with a reduction in discomfort, patients with AF are currently being cardioverted with these waveforms during electrophysiological studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9121995     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04848.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

Review 1.  New concepts in atrial defibrillation.

Authors:  G M Ayers
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  A Heisel; J Jung; B Schubert; U Michel; H Schieffer; R Fries
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1998-02

3.  Single shock endocavitary low energy intracardiac cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Santini; C Pandozi; G Altamura; G Gentilucci; M Villani; M C Scianaro; A Castro; F Ammirati; B Magris
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  The circadian variation of atrial defibrillation thresholds.

Authors:  Andrew Robert John Mitchell; Eduardo Warman; Katie Schaaf; Neil Sulke
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.900

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.