Literature DB >> 9121678

Frontal interhemispheric asymmetry: self regulation and individual differences in humans.

E Hardman1, J Gruzelier, K Cheesman, C Jones, D Liddiard, H Schleichert, N Birbaumer.   

Abstract

Sixteen subjects naive to biofeedback learned lateralised interhemispheric control of slow cortical potentials (SCPs) across electrode sites F3-F4 during three sessions of visual electroencephalograph (EEG) biofeedback. Subjects were required to generate slow negativity shifts either towards the left or the right hemisphere in sixty pseudorandomly ordered trials per session. Group 1 (n = 8) were told to use emotional strategies in the task (positive emotions for left hemisphere activation, negative emotion for right hemisphere activation), group 2 received no guidance. Both groups received feedback in the form of an on-screen rocket-ship, initially centrally placed, which rose to indicate an increase in left hemisphere negativity (relative to the right hemisphere) and fell to indicate an increase in right hemisphere negativity (relative to the left hemisphere). A 2 x 3 x 3 x 2 ANOVA (group x session x block x trial) showed no performance differences between the strategy and no strategy groups. Both groups learned to produce correct direction shifts in the final third of each session during both trial types (P < 0.001). The no strategy group showed a particularly strong within session learning effect (P < 0.0037) with poor performance in the early part of the sessions, and strong shifts at the end. Subjects high on withdrawal showed stronger rightward shifts in keeping with right hemisphere involvement in behavioural withdrawal. This is the first demonstration of self regulation of interhemispheric frontal asymmetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9121678     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(96)13303-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  9 in total

1.  Predictors of successful self control during brain-computer communication.

Authors:  N Neumann; N Birbaumer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Latent profiles of executive functioning in healthy young adults: evidence of individual differences in hemispheric asymmetry.

Authors:  Holly K Rau; Yana Suchy; Jonathan E Butner; Paula G Williams
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-26

3.  The importance of self-efficacy and negative affect for neurofeedback success for central neuropathic pain after a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Krithika Anil; Sara Demain; Jane Burridge; David Simpson; Julian Taylor; Imogen Cotter; Aleksandra Vuckovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  What learning theories can teach us in designing neurofeedback treatments.

Authors:  Ute Strehl
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Are treatment effects of neurofeedback training in children with ADHD related to the successful regulation of brain activity? A review on the learning of regulation of brain activity and a contribution to the discussion on specificity.

Authors:  Agnieszka Zuberer; Daniel Brandeis; Renate Drechsler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Neurofeedback in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder - different models, different ways of application.

Authors:  Holger Gevensleben; Gunther H Moll; Aribert Rothenberger; Hartmut Heinrich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Power Spectral Density and Functional Connectivity Changes due to a Sensorimotor Neurofeedback Training: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Juan L Terrasa; Guzmán Alba; Ignacio Cifre; Beatriz Rey; Pedro Montoya; Miguel A Muñoz
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Neurofeedback as a treatment for major depressive disorder--a pilot study.

Authors:  Frenk Peeters; Mare Oehlen; Jacco Ronner; Jim van Os; Richel Lousberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Self-Regulation of SMR Power Led to an Enhancement of Functional Connectivity of Somatomotor Cortices in Fibromyalgia Patients.

Authors:  Juan L Terrasa; Alfonso Barros-Loscertales; Pedro Montoya; Miguel A Muñoz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.