Literature DB >> 9120525

Accuracy of administrative data for assessing outcomes after knee replacement surgery.

G A Hawker1, P C Coyte, J G Wright, J E Paul, C Bombardier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of information in an administrative database (Canadian Institute for Health Information; CIHI) compared with the hospital record for patients undergoing knee replacement (KR).
METHODS: A stratified random sample of 185 KR recipients from 5 Ontario hospitals were chosen. Their hospital records and corresponding CIHI files were compared to assess percent complete agreement, false negative (FN) and false positive (FP) rates for demographic data, procedures, and diagnoses.
RESULTS: Of 185 records, 175 (95%) were reviewed. Percent complete agreement was greater than 94% for each of patient demographics and procedures (mean FN rates: 0%; mean FP rates: 0-5%). For comorbidities and complications, although mean percent complete agreement was high, and FP rates were low, mean FN rates were 63% for specific comorbid conditions and 70% for organ systems.
CONCLUSIONS: High FN rates have been found in documentation of comorbidities and in-hospital complications for CIHI data compared with the hospital record. Under-coding of comorbidities and in-hospital complications has potential implications for researchers using administrative databases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9120525     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00368-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  22 in total

1.  The development and implementation of a computerized database for clinical research in minimal access surgery. An international pilot study.

Authors:  D W Birch; A Park; M Bailey; W Witzke; D Witzke; J Hoskins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The who, what and when of surgery for the degenerative lumbar spine: a population-based study of surgeon factors, surgical procedures, recent trends and reoperation rates.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Hans J Kreder; Iris Weller; Joel A Finkelstein; Michael H Ford; Albert J M Yee
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Comparison of cardiac surgery mortality reports using administrative and clinical data sources: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cedric Manlhiot; Vivek Rao; Barry Rubin; Douglas S Lee
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-09-04

4.  The impact of intraoperative cholangiography on recurrent pancreatitis and biliary complications in patients with gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Paul M Johnson; Mark J Walsh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Appendectomies in rural hospitals. Safe whether performed by specialist or GP surgeons.

Authors:  S Iglesias; L D Saunders; N Tracy; N Thangisalam; L Jones
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Provider volume and other predictors of outcome after total knee arthroplasty: a population study in Ontario.

Authors:  Hans J Kreder; Paul Grosso; Jack I Williams; Susan Jaglal; Tami Axcell; Eugene K Wal; David J G Stephen
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Maternal outcomes of cesarean sections: do generalists' patients have different outcomes than specialists' patients?

Authors:  Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Sarah Newbery; Len Kelly; Bruce Weaver; Scott Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Short-term Risk of Revision THA in the Medicare Population Has Not Improved With Time.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Kevin Ong; Steven Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Thomas P Vail; Harry Rubash; Daniel Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  National failure to operate on early stage pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Clifford Y Ko; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Mark S Talamonti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention.

Authors:  Nassir M Thalji; Rakesh M Suri; Kevin L Greason; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.