Literature DB >> 9120164

Clinical course and hemodynamic observations after supraannular mitral valve replacement in infants and children.

I Adatia1, P M Moore, R A Jonas, S D Colan, J E Lock, J F Keane.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We report the clinical course and unique hemodynamic findings after placement of a supraannular mitral valve prosthesis.
BACKGROUND: Children with symptomatic mitral valve disease whose annulus is too small for the smallest prosthesis are difficult to manage. One option is valve replacement with a prosthesis positioned entirely within the left atrium (LA).
METHODS: We reviewed 17 patients (median age 10 months) with symptomatic mitral valve disease who underwent placement of a supraannular valve prosthesis between 1980 and 1994.
RESULTS: The actuarial survival rates were 88% at 1 month and 71%, 62% and 53% at 1, 2 and 10 years, respectively. Preoperative hemodynamic data (mean +/- SD)) compared with those after placement of the supraannular mitral prosthesis were as follows: "a" wave to left ventricular end-diastolic pressure gradient 17 +/- 5 versus 4 +/- 4 mm Hg (p = 0.003), mean LA pressure 25 +/- 6 versus 20 +/- 6 mm Hg (p = 0.07), "a" wave 30 +/- 6 versus 19 +/- 5 mm Hg (p = 0.006), "v" wave 28 +/- 5 versus 30 +/- 9 mm Hg (p = 0.31), mean pulmonary artery pressure 54 +/- 19 versus 42 +/- 15 mm Hg (p = 0.07) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure 14 +/- 5 versus 16 +/- 4 mm Hg (p = 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Supraannular mitral valve replacement provides relief of mitral stenosis or mitral regurgitation. However, LA to left ventricular early diastolic gradients with large atrial "v" waves contribute to elevated mean LA pressures in the absence of prosthetic valve obstruction or regurgitation. As a result of this unexpected finding, associated left heart obstructive lesions and pulmonary and left ventricular end-diastolic hypertension, the outlook remains poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9120164     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00017-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  Mitral valve replacement using mechanical prostheses in children: early and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Hyung-Tae Sim; Seung-Cheol Lee; Hong Ju Shin; Jeong-Jun Park; Tae-Jin Yun; Won-Kyoung Jhang; Dong Man Seo
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Mitral valve replacement in children: mortality, morbidity, and haemodynamic status up to medium term follow up.

Authors:  C van Doorn; R Yates; V Tsang; M deLeval; M Elliott
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Mitral valve replacement in infants and children 5 years of age or younger: evolution in practice and outcome over three decades with a focus on supra-annular prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Elif Seda Selamet Tierney; Frank A Pigula; Charles I Berul; James E Lock; Pedro J del Nido; Doff B McElhinney
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Assessment of the Melody valve in the mitral position in young children by echocardiography.

Authors:  Lindsay R Freud; Gerald R Marx; Audrey C Marshall; Wayne Tworetzky; Sitaram M Emani
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Negatively Affects Outcomes after Mitral Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis of 10,239 Patients.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti; Sérgio da Costa Rayol; Roberto Gouvea Silva Diniz; Alexandre Motta Menezes; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.