OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess from the ventricular fibrillation ECG signal whether certain amplitude parameters, or frequency parameters derived using fast Fourier transform analysis, are predictive of countershock success (defined as a stable supraventricular rhythm following countershock). DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive study. SETTING: Emergency medical service at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, whose initial ECG rhythm was identified as ventricular fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In all patients, advanced cardiac life support was performed in the out-of-hospital setting and a semiautomatic defibrillator was used for countershock therapy and simultaneous on-line ECG recording. For each patient, ECG data were stored in modules in digitized form over a period of 20 min and analyzed retrospectively. Using fast Fourier transform analysis of the ventricular fibrillation ECG signal in the frequency range of 0.3 to 30 Hz (mean +/- SD), median frequency, dominant frequency, edge frequency, and amplitude were as follows: 5.17 +/- 1.05 Hz, 4.56 +/- 0.99 Hz, 10.74 +/- 3.46 Hz, and 1.33 +/- 0.44 mV before successful countershock (n = 20); and 4.21 +/- 1.17 Hz (p = 0.0034), 3.31 +/- 1.57 Hz (p = 0.0004), 9.46 +/- 2.93 Hz (p = 0.5390), and 1.15 +/- 0.69 mV (p = 0.0134) before unsuccessful countershock (n = 134). Using software filters to completely eliminate interference due to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the ventricular fibrillation power spectrum, only amplitude remained statistically different (p < or = 0.03) in predicting countershock success. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients, median frequency, dominant frequency, and amplitude are predictive of countershock success in humans.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess from the ventricular fibrillation ECG signal whether certain amplitude parameters, or frequency parameters derived using fast Fourier transform analysis, are predictive of countershock success (defined as a stable supraventricular rhythm following countershock). DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive study. SETTING: Emergency medical service at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, whose initial ECG rhythm was identified as ventricular fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In all patients, advanced cardiac life support was performed in the out-of-hospital setting and a semiautomatic defibrillator was used for countershock therapy and simultaneous on-line ECG recording. For each patient, ECG data were stored in modules in digitized form over a period of 20 min and analyzed retrospectively. Using fast Fourier transform analysis of the ventricular fibrillation ECG signal in the frequency range of 0.3 to 30 Hz (mean +/- SD), median frequency, dominant frequency, edge frequency, and amplitude were as follows: 5.17 +/- 1.05 Hz, 4.56 +/- 0.99 Hz, 10.74 +/- 3.46 Hz, and 1.33 +/- 0.44 mV before successful countershock (n = 20); and 4.21 +/- 1.17 Hz (p = 0.0034), 3.31 +/- 1.57 Hz (p = 0.0004), 9.46 +/- 2.93 Hz (p = 0.5390), and 1.15 +/- 0.69 mV (p = 0.0134) before unsuccessful countershock (n = 134). Using software filters to completely eliminate interference due to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation from the ventricular fibrillation power spectrum, only amplitude remained statistically different (p < or = 0.03) in predicting countershock success. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients, median frequency, dominant frequency, and amplitude are predictive of countershock success in humans.
Authors: Alexander G Shvedko; Mark D Warren; Shibaji Shome; Jeroen Stinstra; Alexey V Zaitsev Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Karen M Darragh; Ganesh Manoharan; Cesar Navarro; Simon J Walsh; John D Allen; John McC Anderson; Aa Jennifer Adgey Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2012-12
Authors: Jason Coult; Heemun Kwok; Lawrence Sherman; Jennifer Blackwood; Peter J Kudenchuk; Thomas D Rea Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Julia H Indik; Richard L Donnerstein; Ronald W Hilwig; Mathias Zuercher; Justin Feigelman; Karl B Kern; Marc D Berg; Robert A Berg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan Journal: Notf Rett Med Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 0.826