Literature DB >> 9118655

Tracheostomy tube occlusion protocol predicts significant tracheal obstruction to air flow in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.

M J Rumbak1, A E Graves, M P Scott, G K Sporn, F W Walsh, W M Anderson, A L Goldman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that a tracheal tube occlusion protocol predicts clinically important obstruction to air flow in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, making routine bronchoscopy unnecessary.
DESIGN: A prospective evaluation of 75 patients who were clinically ready to be decannulated. All patients underwent the tracheal tube occlusion protocol followed by bronchoscopy.
SETTING: Three hospitals affiliated with a college of medicine. PATIENTS: Over a 24-month period, 52 males and 23 females were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 55 yrs (range 25 to 85). Mean endotracheal/tracheostomy time was 2.4/8.9 wks (range 1 to 4/5 to 14). All patients were mechanically ventilated for at least 4 wks and were successfully weaned from the mechanical ventilator for at least 48 hrs. During spontaneous breathing, these data were observed: minute ventilation of < 10 L/min; resting respiratory rate of < 18 breaths/min; and arterial oxygen saturation of > 90% on 40% oxygen tracheal collar mask. The tracheal tube occlusion protocol consisted of deflating the cuff on the fenestrated tracheal tube and occluding the tube.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients who developed respiratory distress when the tracheal tube was occluded were deemed to have failed the protocol. At bronchoscopy, the patients were asked to cough and hyperventilate in an attempt to forcibly reduce the cross-sectional area of the trachea. A sustained, subjectively assessed decrease of > or = 50% of the effective cross-sectional area of the trachea was considered to be an indication for intervention.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-three (84%) of 75 patients tolerated the tracheal tube occlusion protocol. Twelve (16%) of 75 patients developed signs of respiratory distress and showed decreased oxygen saturation values necessitating uncapping of the tracheal tube. All patients had some degree of tracheal injury. However, those patients who failed to tolerate the tracheal tube occlusion protocol had clinically important tracheal obstruction to air flow.
CONCLUSION: A tracheal tube occlusion protocol can predict clinically important obstruction to air flow after prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9118655     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199703000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  8 in total

1.  The effects of increasing effective airway diameter on weaning from mechanical ventilation in tracheostomized patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Gonzalo Hernandez; Ana Pedrosa; Ramon Ortiz; Maria del Mar Cruz Accuaroni; Rafael Cuena; Concepción Vaquero Collado; Susana García Plaza; Paloma González Arenas; Rafael Fernandez
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Effects of Capping of the Tracheostomy Tube in Stroke Patients With Dysphagia.

Authors:  Yong Kyun Kim; Sang-Heon Lee; Jang-Won Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-06-29

Review 3.  The practice of tracheostomy decannulation-a systematic review.

Authors:  Ratender Kumar Singh; Sai Saran; Arvind K Baronia
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2017-06-20

4.  Effect of tracheostomy tube on work of breathing: Comparison of pre- and post-decannulation.

Authors:  Darío Villalba; Viviana Feld; Valeria Leiva; Mariana Scrigna; Eduardo Distéfano; Romina Pratto; Matías Rodriguez; Jesica Collins; Ana Rocco; Amelia Matesa; Damián Rossi; Laura Areas; Sacha Virgilio; Nicolás Golfarini; Gregorio Gil-Rosetti; Pablo Diaz-Ballve; Fernando Planells
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Guidelines for Tracheostomy From the Korean Bronchoesophagological Society.

Authors:  Inn-Chul Nam; Yoo Seob Shin; Woo-Jin Jeong; Min Woo Park; Seong Yong Park; Chang Myeon Song; Young Chan Lee; Jae Hyun Jeon; Jongmin Lee; Chang Hyun Kang; Il-Seok Park; Kwhanmien Kim; Dong Il Sun
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.372

6.  Tracheostomy decannulation protocol in patients with prolonged tracheostomy referred to a rehabilitation hospital: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ting Zhou; Jianjun Wang; Chenxi Zhang; Bin Zhang; Haiming Guo; Bo Yang; Qing Li; Jingyi Ge; Yi Li; Guangyu Niu; Hua Gao; Hongying Jiang
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2022-07-16

Review 7.  Tracheotomy in the intensive care unit: guidelines from a French expert panel.

Authors:  Jean Louis Trouillet; Olivier Collange; Fouad Belafia; François Blot; Gilles Capellier; Eric Cesareo; Jean-Michel Constantin; Alexandre Demoule; Jean-Luc Diehl; Pierre-Grégoire Guinot; Franck Jegoux; Erwan L'Her; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Yazine Mahjoub; Julien Mayaux; Hervé Quintard; François Ravat; Sebastien Vergez; Julien Amour; Max Guillot
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.925

8.  Multidisciplinary guidance for safe tracheostomy care during the COVID-19 pandemic: the NHS National Patient Safety Improvement Programme (NatPatSIP).

Authors:  B A McGrath; N Ashby; M Birchall; P Dean; C Doherty; K Ferguson; J Gimblett; M Grocott; T Jacob; C Kerawala; P Macnaughton; P Magennis; R Moonesinghe; P Twose; S Wallace; A Higgs
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 12.893

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.