Literature DB >> 9118374

Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: real-time three-dimensional interactive seed implantation.

N N Stone1, R G Stock.   

Abstract

A total of 71 men with clinical T1b-T2c carcinoma of the prostate underwent ultrasound-guided interactive seed implantation of the prostate. Sixty received 125I and II 103Pd implants. A laparoscopic lymph node dissection was performed in 58 patients. The patients have been followed a mean of 2 years (1-4.2 years). With use of a prostate specific antigen (PSA) value of 1 ng/ml, patients (n = 8) who presented with an initial PSA of < or = 4.0 ng/ml were all free from failure. This compared with those who presented with an initial PSA of 4.1-10, 10.1-20, and > or = 20 ng/ml, in whom the freedom from failure rates were 52, 32, and 22%, respectively. Patients (n = 49) who presented with an initial PSA of less than or equal to 15 ng/ml had a median PSA of 0.88 ng/ml at last follow-up compared with 2.25 ng/ml for those with an initial PSA of > 15 ng/ml. Prostate biopsies performed 18-24 months after implantation were negative in 82%. The median PSA for those with a negative biopsy was 0.7 ng/ml vs. 4.9 ng/ml for those with a positive biopsy. There were no long-term persistent urinary complaints. Grade 2 radiation proctitis occurred in three (4.2%). No cases of severe radiation proctitis or cystitis occurred. Urinary retention occurred in four patients (5.6%), one of whom required a transurethral resection of the prostate. No patients developed urinary incontinence. Potency was preserved in 94%. We conclude that the real-time ultrasound-guided transperineal seed implantation technique is an effective and safe method of treating prostate cancer. Longer follow-up is needed to substantiate these early encouraging results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9118374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Urol        ISSN: 1079-3259


  7 in total

1.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy versus brachytherapy for low-risk prostatic cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  C Giberti; L Chiono; Fabrizio Gallo; M Schenone; E Gastaldi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Biomedical Imaging in Implantable Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Haoyan Zhou; Christopher Hernandez; Monika Goss; Anna Gawlik; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.465

Review 3.  What happened? Sexual consequences of prostate cancer and its treatment.

Authors:  Anne Katz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  A simple technique for the generation of institution-specific nomograms for permanent prostate cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Kyle J Lafata; Harry Bushe; Jesse N Aronowitz
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2014-09-23

5.  Prospective four years of evaluation of erectile function after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy using baseline IIEF-5 > 16.

Authors:  Nadja Schoentgen; Julien Marolleau; Francky Delage; Jean-Baptiste Coquet; Alexandre Fourcade; Pierre Callerot; Sophie Serey-Eiffel; Jean-Pierre Malhaire; Olivier Pradier; Ulrike Schick; Georges Fournier; Antoine Valeri
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

6.  Toxicity in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy using intraoperatively built custom-linked seeds versus loose seeds.

Authors:  Luc Ollivier; Francois Lucia; Truongan Nguyen; Caroline Lucas; Vincent Bourbonne; Nicolas Boussion; Gaelle Goasduff; Georges Fournier; Olivier Pradier; Gurvan Dissaux; Antoine Valeri; Ulrike Schick
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-12-16

7.  Difference in the rate of rectal complications following prostate brachytherapy based on the prostate-rectum distance and the prostate longitudinal length among early prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Moon Hyung Kang; Young Dong Yu; Hyun Soo Shin; Jong Jin Oh; Dong Soo Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-09-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.