Literature DB >> 9118174

Potential bias in classroom research: comparison of children with permission and those who do not receive permission to participate.

R B Noll1, M H Zeller, K Vannatta, W M Bukowski, W H Davies.   

Abstract

Compared both the social reputation and preference/acceptance of children who received (n = 4,073) and did not receive parental consent (n = 469) to participate in classroom-based sociometric research. Peers and teachers described nonparticipants as less sociable. Peers described nonparticipants as being lower on social acceptance, more aggressive, and less academically competent. No significant differences were obtained for sensitive/isolated characteristics, appearance, or athleticism. There were no significant interactions between consent status and sex or age. Associations between social reputation and social preference scores were similar for participants and nonparticipants. The findings suggest that children who do not return consent forms are systematically different from classmates who participate, although these differences were modest. Further work is needed to determine why children do not participate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9118174     DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2601_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Child Psychol        ISSN: 0047-228X


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents.

Authors:  Andrea F de Winter; Albertine J Oldehinkel; René Veenstra; J Agnes Brunnekreef; Frank C Verhulst; Johan Ormel
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Predicting nonresponse bias from teacher ratings of mental health problems in primary school children.

Authors:  Kjell Morten Stormark; Einar Heiervang; Mikael Heimann; Astri Lundervold; Christopher Gillberg
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2007-12-27

3.  School-based survey participation: oral health and BMI survey of Ohio third graders.

Authors:  Amber M R Detty
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-09

4.  Evaluating Active Parental Consent Procedures for School Programming: Addressing the Sensitive Topic of Suicide Prevention.

Authors:  Christine M Wienke Totura; Krista Kutash; Christa D Labouliere; Marc S Karver
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.118

5.  Benefits of extensive recruitment effort persist during follow-ups and are consistent across age group and survey method. The TRAILS study.

Authors:  Esther Nederhof; Frederike Jörg; Dennis Raven; René Veenstra; Frank C Verhulst; Johan Ormel; Albertine J Oldehinkel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Response rates and selection problems, with emphasis on mental health variables and DNA sampling, in large population-based, cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of adolescents in Norway.

Authors:  Espen Bjertness; Ase Sagatun; Kristian Green; Lars Lien; Anne Johanne Søgaard; Randi Selmer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health.

Authors:  Kei Long Cheung; Peter M Ten Klooster; Cees Smit; Hein de Vries; Marcel E Pieterse
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Screening for psychiatric morbidity in the population - a comparison of the GHQ-12 and self-reported medication use.

Authors:  Foteini Tseliou; Michael Donnelly; Dermot O'Reilly
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2018-03-07

9.  A Transdiagnostic, Emotion Regulation App (Eda) for Children: Design, Development, and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Bettina Moltrecht; Praveetha Patalay; Holly Alice Bear; Jessica Deighton; Julian Edbrooke-Childs
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-01-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.