Literature DB >> 9118043

A case-matched molecular comparison of extraovarian versus primary ovarian adenocarcinoma.

L D Kowalski1, A I Kanbour, F V Price, S D Finkelstein, W A Christopherson, J C Seski, G J Naus, J A Burnham, A Kanbour-Shakir, R P Edwards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extraovarian müllerian adenocarcinoma (EOM) resembles primary ovarian carcinoma (POC) both histologically and clinically, yet little is known regarding the molecular genetic characteristics of this entity. The objective of this study was to compare the expression of three molecular markers of tumor behavior in EOMs and POCs.
METHODS: Forty-four patients meeting strict criteria for EOM were identified and matched to POC controls for age, stage, tumor histology and grade, cytoreductive surgery, and survival. Immunohistochemistry was used to determine overexpression of p53 and HER-2/neu. DNA content was evaluated by flow cytometry. Direct DNA sequencing of exons 5-8 of the p53 gene was performed in nine EOM tumors. Statistical comparisons were made using chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Mantel-Cox log rank methods.
RESULTS: Overexpression of HER-2/neu was demonstrated in 59% (26 of 44) of the EOM group versus 36% overexpression (16 of 44) in the POC controls (P = 0.05). Overexpression of p53 was noted in 48% of the EOM cases, similar to the 59% incidence observed in the control group (P = 0.29). Missense mutations were found in 9 of 9 EOM tumors showing strong p53 nuclear immunostaining. No significant difference in the incidence of aneuploidy was observed when EOM cases were compared with POC controls (65% vs. 63%). High tumor grade was strongly associated with HER-2/neu overexpression in the EOM group (P = 0.002). None of the parameters studied were predictive of prognosis within the EOM and POC groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although overexpression of p53 protein, p53 gene mutations, and abnormal DNA content were similar between EOMs and POCs, EOMs demonstrated almost twice the rate of HER-2/neu overexpression. This result suggests that distinct genetic events may be responsible for malignant transformation in EOMs versus POCs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9118043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

Review 1.  Peritoneal carcinoma in women with genetic susceptibility: implications for Jewish populations.

Authors:  Murray Joseph Casey; Chhanda Bewtra
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Advanced primary peritoneal carcinoma: clinicopathological and prognostic factor analyses.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Xiao-ping Li; Heng Cui; Dan-hua Shen; Li-hui Wei
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Clinical characteristics of primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sang Young Roh; Sook Hee Hong; Yoon Ho Ko; Tae Hee Kim; Myung Ah Lee; Byoung Yong Shim; Jae Ho Byun; In Sook Woo; Jin Hyoung Kang; Young Seon Hong; Kyung Shik Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

4.  Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma Initially Presenting as Atypical Cervical Lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Yun Mi Kim; Yeong Min Lee; Si Hyeing Lee; Dong Woo Lee; Ki Hyang Kim
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2015-05-28

Review 5.  Narrative review on serous primary peritoneal carcinoma of unknown primary site: four questions to be answered.

Authors:  Elie Rassy; Tarek Assi; Stergios Boussios; Joseph Kattan; Julie Smith-Gagen; Nicholas Pavlidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

6.  Genetic landscape of a case of extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhongping Cheng; Weihong Yang; Jing Guo; Ning Luo; Li Chen; Yan Xie; Xiaoyan Qu; Liping Hu; Hong Dai; Xiaoming Zuo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.967

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.