Literature DB >> 9117212

Supravesical diversion for incontinence: a long-term follow-up.

G Singh1, J M Wilkinson, D G Thomas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the long-term follow-up of patients with an ileal conduit urinary diversion, constructed for intractable incontinence in patients with benign disease where the native bladder was left in situ, and to determine the fate of the bladder and the effects on the upper tracts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-three patients (mean age at operation 50 years, range 8-78) were followed for a minimum of 2 (mean 5) years after undergoing an ileal conduit urinary diversion. Seventy-one patients (76%) had neurological disease (18 traumatic and 53 non-traumatic) and the single largest group of patients (28) suffered from disseminated sclerosis. Twenty-two patients with no obvious neurological disease underwent the procedure for unmanageable incontinence or intractable bladder symptoms or for interstitial cystitis. The patients were assessed for problems in the bladder remnant, stomal problems and upper tract changes following surgery.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (52%) had recurrent vesical infections and pyocystis and of these, 23 (48%) required admission for in-patient bladder irrigations. To control recurrent bladder problems, five patients required creation of a vesico-vaginal fistula; this did not suffice in two and they subsequently underwent cystectomy; in total, five patients underwent cystectomy. Twenty-nine patients (31%) had stomal problems, those with the skin being commonest. Parastomal hernia repair was required in 10 (10%) patients and three had further surgery for recurrence. Of 83 patients with normal upper tracts before diversion, post-operative radiological assessment showed upper tract dilatation in 28 (34%) and in 10 (12%) this was bilateral. In one patient with a neuropathic bladder, the ileal diversion resulted regression of the dilated upper tracts.
CONCLUSIONS: Supravesical diversion is safe and well tolerated but assessing the long-term follow-up, the incidence of bladder problems in over half these patients and upper tract changes in over a third suggests an indefinite follow-up is mandatory. Despite these problems, most patients are delighted with the outcome of their surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9117212     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.01007.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  16 in total

Review 1.  Surgical complications of urinary diversion.

Authors:  Scott B Farnham; Michael S Cookson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Complications associated with urinary diversion.

Authors:  Richard E Hautmann; Stefan H Hautmann; Oliver Hautmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  [Correction of parastomal hernia using meshes].

Authors:  A Lampel; N Runkel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Pyocystis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mohamed H Kamel; Ramsey Gardner; Ali Tourchi; Karen Tart; Omer Raheem; Bradley Houston; Nabil Bissada; Rodney Davis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Percutaneous nephrostomy: technical aspects and indications.

Authors:  Mandeep Dagli; Parvati Ramchandani
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Bladder augmentation and urinary diversion for neurogenic LUTS: current indications.

Authors:  Kamran P Sajadi; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  [Long-term follow-up of the defunctionalized bladder after urinary diversion].

Authors:  F-C von Rundstedt; D Lazica; A S Brandt; M J Mathers; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  The surgical management of the refractory overactive bladder.

Authors:  Nikhil Vasdev; Benjamin D Biles; Raveen Sandher; Tahseen S Hasan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-04

Review 9.  Renal function in the setting of urinary diversion.

Authors:  Axel Kristjansson; Wiking Mansson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Pyocystis in patients on chronic dialysis. A potentially misdiagnosed syndrome.

Authors:  John L Bibb; Karen S Servilla; Lawrence J Gibel; Jane E Kinne; Robert E White; Michael F Hartshsorne; Antonios H Tzamaloukas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.