Literature DB >> 9115679

Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage of the dentin/restoration interface.

D H Retief1, R S Mandras, C M Russell.   

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the relationship between the shear bond strength [SBS] of seven dentin bonding systems to dentin and the quantitative microleakage [ML] of Class V preparations in dentin restored with these systems. The systems evaluated were All-Bond/Bisfil-P [A]; Syntac/Heliomolar [B]; XR-Bond/Herculite [C]; Scotchbond 2/Silux [D]; Denthesive/Charisma [E]; Prisma Universal Bond 2/Prisma AP.H [F]; and Tenure/Perfection [G]. The 115 specimens were removed from the assembly apparatus and stored in saline at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, the SBS determined and expressed in MPa. Fifteen Class V preparations in dentin were restored with each of the bonding systems, thermocycled 500x in 2% methylene blue solution between 50 degrees C and 8 degrees C, and the ML determined by means of a spectrophotometric dye-recovery method. The ML was expressed in microgram dye/restoration. The data were analyzed by ANOVA, Student-Newman-Keuls test, and linear regression analysis. The SBS in MPa were: A:17.2 +/- 3.6; B:15.9 +/- 2.1; C:15.4 +/- 3.7; D:11.6 +/- 2.2; E:10.7 +/- 3.7; F:10.4 +/- 2.5; G:8.2 +/- 3.9. The ML in microgram dye/restoration were: A:2.6 +/- 1.2; B:2.6 +/- 1.0; C:2.2 +/- 1.9; D:3.1 +/- 2.9; E:4.6 +/- 4.2; F:2.6 +/- 2.5; G:4.4 +/- 4.1. SBS = 20.91-2.60 [microgram dye]. The results suggest that a SBS of +/- 21 MPa may reduce ML to near zero.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 9115679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dent        ISSN: 0894-8275            Impact factor:   1.522


  7 in total

1.  Er,Cr:YSGG laser influence on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations.

Authors:  Tahereh Fattah; Haleh Kazemi; Reza Fekrazad; Hadi Assadian; Katayoun A M Kalhori
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.

Authors:  Stephanie Krifka; Marianne Federlin; Karl-Anton Hiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Influence of the methodology and evaluation criteria on determining microleakage in dentin-restorative interfaces.

Authors:  Denise Arliane Amarante de Camargo; Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Manoel Damião de Sousa Neto; Simonides Consani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations.

Authors:  Ricardo M Carvalho; Adriana P Manso; Saulo Geraldeli; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  A comparative evaluation of dentinal hypersensitivity and microleakage associated with composite restorations in cavities preconditioned with air abrasion - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ankit Arora; Shashi Rashmi Acharya; Saraswathi M Vidya; Padmaja Sharma
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-07

6.  Microleakage in Class II composite restorations with margins below the CEJ: in vitro evaluation of different restorative techniques.

Authors:  Claudio Poggio; Marco Chiesa; Andrea Scribante; Jenia Mekler; Marco Colombo
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-09-01

7.  Comparative in vitro evaluation of internal adaptation of resin-modified glass ionomer, flowable composite and bonding agent applied as a liner under composite restoration: A scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  M Soubhagya; K Mallikarjun Goud; B S Deepak; Sophia Thakur; T N Nandini; J Arun
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.