Literature DB >> 9115556

Fatigue properties of suture anchors in anterior shoulder reconstructions: Mitek GII.

M J Wetzler1, A R Bartolozzi, M J Gillespie, C A Roth, M G Ciccotti, L Snyder-Mackler, M H Santare.   

Abstract

Suture anchors have simplified anterior capsule labral reconstruction. During rehabilitation the shoulder goes through many repetitions of range of motion exercises. These exercises will repetitively submaximally load the anchor and in theory should reduce the pullout strength of the suture anchor. No published reports exist on the fatigue strengths and properties of one of the most commonly used anchors: Mitek GII suture anchors. Fifty trials of cyclic submaximal load were done on 22 cadaveric glenoids with an average age of 66.8 years (range, 40 to 90 years). At two to three different sites on the same specimen, the anchors were inserted according to manufacturer's specifications. The anchors were tested to failure on a Instron 1331 servohydraulic mechanical testing system at 2 Hertz sinusoidal loading pattern using steel sutures and a predetermined load. There were 22 (44%) tests performed in the superior quadrant and 28 (56%) tests in the inferior quadrant. All anchors pulled out, and no wires broke. There were statistically significant differences between the superior and inferior portion of the glenoid with regard to number of cycles to failure at a given maximum load. The anchors underwent an average of 6,220 cycles before pullout at an average load of 162 N (SD = 73 N). In the superior quadrant, the average ultimate pullout strength was 237 N (SD = 42 N), whereas in the inferior quadrant the average ultimate pullout strength was 126 N (SD = 36 N). Hence, the ultimate pullout strength of the Mitek GII anchor was significantly higher (P < .002) in the superior quadrant than in the inferior quadrant. Using a least squares regression analysis, it was possible to predict the fatigue life of the superiorly and inferiorly placed suture anchors over a wide range of cycles. The R-squared values for trendlines showed good reliability (superior R2 = 0.55; inferior R2 = 0.28). The fatigue life curves for the two different quadrants were normalized using the ultimate pullout strength. This new, universal curve predicts the fatigue life of the Mitek GII anchor as a percentage of the ultimate pullout strength for any selected location. For a clinically relevant number of cycles, no more than approximately 40% to 50% of the ultimate pullout strength of the suture anchor can be cyclically applied to the anchor to guarantee a life for the duration of rehabilitation. For the entire system, the inferiorly placed anchors dictate the amount of cyclically applied load the system can experience without failing, and rehabilitation should be adjusted accordingly.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9115556     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(96)90171-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  8 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of knotless anterior and posterior Bankart repairs.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Max P Michalski; Kyle S Jansson; Coen A Wijdicks; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Maximum load to failure and tensile displacement of an all-suture glenoid anchor compared with a screw-in glenoid anchor.

Authors:  Tim Dwyer; Thomas L Willett; Andrew P Dold; Massimo Petrera; David Wasserstein; Danny B Whelan; John S Theodoropoulos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  MRI assessment of the structural labrum integrity after Bankart repair using knotless bio-anchors.

Authors:  T Stein; A P Mehling; C Reck; J Buckup; T Efe; R Hoffmann; A Jäger; F Welsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  MRI graduation of osseous reaction and drill hole consolidation after arthroscopic Bankart repair with PLLA anchors and the clinical relevance.

Authors:  T Stein; A P Mehling; M Ulmer; C Reck; T Efe; R Hoffmann; A Jäger; F Welsch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Analysis of glenoid inter-anchor distance with an all-suture anchor system.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kramer; Sean Robinson; Connor Purviance; William Montgomery
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-02

6.  Enhanced rehabilitation guidance after arthroscopic capsulolabral repair of the shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Juhani Multanen; Pauli Kiuru; Kirsi Piitulainen; Jari Ylinen; Juha Paloneva; Arja Häkkinen
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.477

7.  Mapping of the Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament for Suture Pullout Strength: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Sumit Raniga; Joseph Cadman; Danè Dabirrahmani; David Bui; Richard Appleyard; Desmond Bokor
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-11

8.  Are Suture Tape Knots as Secure as Standard Suture? A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Catherine M Rapp; Denise M Koueiter; Jeremy Bojnowski; Jeremy Kalma; Brett Wiater; Michael D Kurdziel; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.