Literature DB >> 9115077

Selecting patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy for medical treatment, revascularization, or heart transplantation.

G A Beller1.   

Abstract

Three major treatment options are available to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: medical therapy, coronary revascularization, or heart transplantation. Although survival rates have been enhanced with vasodilator therapy in such patients, the ultimate outcome is still poor. Coronary revascularization, although beneficial in some patients, may lead to disappointing outcomes in others. Cardiovascular specialists have searched for better criteria to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from revascularization compared with medical therapy, which is often followed by heart transplantation. An accurate noninvasive assessment of myocardial viability that can distinguish irreversible myocardial cellular injury from myocardial hibernation may be useful for clinical decision making. It permits selection of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who will most benefit from revascularization strategies with respect to postoperative improvement in regional and global left ventricular function and survival. In general, the greater the extent of viability in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease, the better the prognosis with revascularization strategies. Radionuclide methods have emerged that can evaluate myocardial viability accurately. As hospitals face more pressure from managed-care organizations to reduce health-care costs, more practice guidelines are necessary to identify which patients are to benefit from which strategies and to identify when they are unlikely to benefit from costly interventions such as coronary bypass. Conversely, the cost-effectiveness of nuclear cardiology may be substantial if certain patients referred for transplantation are identified to have a good outcome with revascularization, even in the absence of anginal symptoms. Thus nuclear cardiology might provide valuable information that not only improves outcomes but also reduces overall costs of managing patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9115077     DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(97)90094-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  3 in total

Review 1.  Quantification of SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Wanda Acampa; Wei He; Carmine di Nuzzo; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Prognostic value of perfusion-FDG mismatch in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Frans C Visser; Don Poldermans; Abdou Elhendy; Eric Boersma; Cees A Visser; Jos R T C Roelandt
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Extent of myocardial viability in regions of left ventricular dysfunction by rest-redistribution thallium-201 imaging: a powerful predictor of outcome.

Authors:  G A Beller; M Ragosta
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.