Literature DB >> 9114257

Marginal shell of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus: single-unit response properties in the unanesthetized decerebrate cat.

S Ghoshal1, D O Kim.   

Abstract

The marginal shell of the anteroventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) is anatomically different from its central core. We investigated 38 single units in the shells of 10 cats and contrasted them with 62 single units in the cores of 15 cats. The sites of all shell units were localized with the use of reconstructed electrode tracks. The shell units were divided into acoustically well-driven (68%) and weakly/not-driven (32%) subgroups. The shell units mostly exhibited low spontaneous rates (SRs). Among the well-driven shell units, a large majority (68%) exhibited wide dynamic ranges (> or = 50 dB) to tones, noise, or both, with some ranges as wide as 89 dB. In contrast, a large majority (80%) of the core units exhibited narrow dynamic ranges (< 50 dB) to tones and noise. The poststimulus time histograms (PSTHs) of the well-driven shell units included pause-build (29%), onset (24%), and unusual (33%) types, whereas those of the core units included mainly primary-like (47%) and chopper (29%) types. The excitatory-inhibitory areas (EIAs) of the well-driven shell units included types I/III (47%), III (22%), IV (13%), and II (9%), whereas those of the core units included mainly types III (52%) and I/III (32%). On the basis of Fisher's exact tests, we conclude that the shell and core neural groups of the AVCN are significantly different regarding all of the following physiological characteristics: SR, maximum driven rate, threshold and dynamic range to tones and noise, frequency response area, PSTH type, latency, and EIA type. Wide dynamic ranges of the well-driven shell units suggest that they may play a role in encoding absolute intensity of acoustic stimulus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9114257     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.4.2083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Auditory responses in the cochlear nucleus of awake mustached bats: precursors to spectral integration in the auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Robert A Marsh; Kiran Nataraj; Donald Gans; Christine V Portfors; Jeffrey J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Projections of low spontaneous rate, high threshold auditory nerve fibers to the small cell cap of the cochlear nucleus in cats.

Authors:  D K Ryugo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  The spiral ganglion: connecting the peripheral and central auditory systems.

Authors:  Bryony A Nayagam; Michael A Muniak; David K Ryugo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Olivocochlear projections contribute to superior intensity coding in cochlear nucleus small cells.

Authors:  Adam Hockley; Calvin Wu; Susan E Shore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.228

5.  Commissural neurons in the rat ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  John R Doucet; Nicole M Lenihan; Bradford J May
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-01-27

6.  Structural and functional classes of multipolar cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  John R Doucet; David K Ryugo
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2006-04

7.  Vesicular glutamate transporter 2 is associated with the cochlear nucleus commissural pathway.

Authors:  Jianxun Zhou; Chunhua Zeng; Yilei Cui; Susan Shore
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-24

8.  Noise-induced hearing loss vulnerability in type III intermediate filament peripherin gene knockout mice.

Authors:  Jennie M E Cederholm; Kristina E Parley; Chamini J Perera; Georg von Jonquieres; Jeremy L Pinyon; Jean-Pierre Julien; David K Ryugo; Allen F Ryan; Gary D Housley
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.086

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.