PURPOSE: To determine differences in computed tomographic (CT) findings in asthmatic and healthy individuals and to correlate the findings with severity of airway obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine asthmatic patients and 14 healthy subjects were prospectively evaluated with thin-section CT. Inspiratory CT scans were subjectively evaluated for presence of bronchial wall thickening, bronchial dilatation, and mosaic lung attenuation; expiratory scans were subjectively evaluated for presence of air trapping. Objective measurement of bronchoarterial-diameter ratio was performed on inspiratory scans. CT findings were compared with pulmonary function test results. RESULTS: Bronchial wall thickening, severe air trapping, and reduced bronchoarterial-diameter ratio were observed more commonly in asthmatic patients than in healthy subjects. Bronchial wall thickening was more prevalent among patients with severe airflow obstruction (10 of 12 readings [83%]) than in patients with normal airflow (15 of 40 readings [38%]) or mild obstruction (nine of 26 readings [35%]). Other subjectively determined CT findings did not correlate with pulmonary function test results. The mean bronchoarterial-diameter ratios +/- 1 standard deviation were 0.65 +/- 0.16 in healthy subjects and 0.60 +/- 0.16, 0.60 +/- 0.18, and 0.48 +/- 0.11 in patients with normal airflow and mild and severe obstruction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thin-section CT is of limited value in distinguishing asthmatic patients with normal airflow or mild airflow obstruction from healthy subjects.
PURPOSE: To determine differences in computed tomographic (CT) findings in asthmatic and healthy individuals and to correlate the findings with severity of airway obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine asthmatic patients and 14 healthy subjects were prospectively evaluated with thin-section CT. Inspiratory CT scans were subjectively evaluated for presence of bronchial wall thickening, bronchial dilatation, and mosaic lung attenuation; expiratory scans were subjectively evaluated for presence of air trapping. Objective measurement of bronchoarterial-diameter ratio was performed on inspiratory scans. CT findings were compared with pulmonary function test results. RESULTS: Bronchial wall thickening, severe air trapping, and reduced bronchoarterial-diameter ratio were observed more commonly in asthmatic patients than in healthy subjects. Bronchial wall thickening was more prevalent among patients with severe airflow obstruction (10 of 12 readings [83%]) than in patients with normal airflow (15 of 40 readings [38%]) or mild obstruction (nine of 26 readings [35%]). Other subjectively determined CT findings did not correlate with pulmonary function test results. The mean bronchoarterial-diameter ratios +/- 1 standard deviation were 0.65 +/- 0.16 in healthy subjects and 0.60 +/- 0.16, 0.60 +/- 0.18, and 0.48 +/- 0.11 in patients with normal airflow and mild and severe obstruction, respectively. CONCLUSION: Thin-section CT is of limited value in distinguishing asthmatic patients with normal airflow or mild airflow obstruction from healthy subjects.
Authors: Christopher Manganaris; Steven Wittlin; Haodong Xu; Michael Gurell; Patricia Sime; Robert Matthew Kottmann Journal: Chest Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Lee Gazourian; Samuel Ash; Emily E K Meserve; Alejandro Diaz; Raul San Jose Estepar; Souheil Y El-Chemaly; Ivan O Rosas; Miguel Divo; Anne L Fuhlbrigge; Phillip C Camp; Vincent T Ho; Ami S Bhatt; Hilary J Goldberg; Lynette M Sholl; George R Washko Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Alejandro A Diaz; Thomas P Young; Diego J Maselli; Carlos H Martinez; Erick S Maclean; Andrew Yen; Chandra Dass; Scott A Simpson; David A Lynch; Gregory L Kinney; John E Hokanson; George R Washko; Raul San José Estépar Journal: Respirology Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: R Scott Harris; Tilo Winkler; Nora Tgavalekos; Guido Musch; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Tobias Schroeder; Yuchiao Chang; José G Venegas Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-05-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: S A Little; M W Sproule; M D Cowan; K J Macleod; M Robertson; J G Love; G W Chalmers; C P McSharry; N C Thomson Journal: Thorax Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 9.139