Literature DB >> 9111744

Eye position tunes the contribution of allocentric and egocentric information to target localization in human goal-directed arm movements.

M Gentilucci1, E Daprati, M Gangitano, I Toni.   

Abstract

Subjects were required to point to the distant vertex of the closed and the open configurations of the Müller-Lyer illusion using either their right hand (experiment 1) or their left hand (experiment 2). In both experiments the Müller-Lyer figures were horizontally presented either in the left or in the right hemispace and movements were executed using either foveal or peripheral vision of the target. According to the illusion effect, subjects undershot and overshot the vertex location of the closed and the open configuration, respectively. The illusion effect decreased when the target was fixated and when the stimulus was positioned in the right hemispace. These results confirm the hypothesis that both egocentric and allocentric information are combined in order to encode target position in space. When movements are directed to foveal targets, decreasing effects of allocentric cues, as shown by decreasing the illusion effect, could be due to enhanced efficiency of the egocentric system. That is, information on eye position when target is fixated can be used to precisely establish its spatial relations with the body. In addition, a more accurate analysis of allocentric information is hypothesized when the target is positioned in the left hemispace. In other words, our data confirm the notion that the right cerebral hemisphere is involved in space representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9111744     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)13366-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  9 in total

1.  Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.

Authors:  John Predebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Allocentric cues do not always improve whole body reaching performance.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Yongqin Cui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The Brentano illusion influences goal-directed movements of the left and right hand to the same extent.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Pointing control using a moving base of support.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Taegyong Kwon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Altered aiming movements in Parkinson's disease patients and elderly adults as a function of delays in movement onset.

Authors:  Diana H Romero; Arend W A Van Gemmert; Charles H Adler; Harold Bekkering; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visuomotor transformation for interception: catching while fixating.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Left, right, left, right, eyes to the front! Müller-Lyer bias in grasping is not a function of hand used, hand preferred or visual hemifield, but foveation does matter.

Authors:  John van der Kamp; Matthieu M de Wit; Rich S W Masters
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Learning arm/hand coordination with an altered visual input.

Authors:  Simona Denisia Iftime Nielsen; Strahinja Dosen; Mirjana B Popović; Dejan B Popović
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-19

9.  Perception, action, and Roelofs effect: a mere illusion of dissociation.

Authors:  Paul Dassonville; Jagdeep Kaur Bala
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 8.029

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.