Literature DB >> 9111455

Wrist biomechanics during two speeds of wheelchair propulsion: an analysis using a local coordinate system.

M L Boninger1, R A Cooper, R N Robertson, T E Rudy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe motion, forces, and moments occurring at the wrist in anatomic terms during wheelchair propulsion; to obtain variables that characterize wrist function during propulsion and are statistically stable; and to determine how these variables change with speed.
DESIGN: Case series.
SETTING: Biomechanics laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of Paralympic athletes (n = 6) who use manual wheelchairs for mobility and have unimpaired arm function. INTERVENTION: Subjects propelled a standard wheelchair on a dynamometer at 1.3m/sec and 2.2m/sec. Biomechanical data were obtained using a force and moment sensing pushrim and a motion analysis system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maximum angles, forces, and moments in a local, wrist coordinate system. Each variable was evaluated for stability using Cronbach's alpha. Measures found to be stable (infinity > .8) at each speed were then compared to look for differences associated with speed.
RESULTS: The following measures were stable at both speeds: maximum wrist flexion, ulnar deviation, and radial deviation angles, peak moments acting to cause wrist flexion, extension, and ulnar deviation, peak shear forces acting between the radial and ulnar styloids, and peak axial force acting at the wrist. Of these measures, the following measures differed (p < .05) between speeds (+/-SD): maximum radial deviation (1.3m/sec, 25.1 degrees +/- 9.0; 2.2m/sec, 21.4 degrees +/- 6.9), peak flexion moment (1.3m/ sec, 3.4N.m +/- 3.0; 2.2m/sec, 5.2N.m +/- 3.7), peak extension moment (1.3m/sec, 10.4N.m +/- 4.8; 2.2m/sec, 13.6N.m +/- 5.1), peak shear acting from the ulnar styloid to the radial styloid (1.3m/sec, 2.3N +/- 2.7, 2.2m/sec, 8.3N +/- 7.5) and maximum axial force (1.3m/sec, 50.9N +/- 18.2; 2.2m/sec, 65.9N +/- 27.6).
CONCLUSION: This study found stable parameters that characterize wrist biomechanics during wheelchair propulsion and varied with speed. Ultimately these parameters may provide insight into the cause and prevention of wrist injuries in manual wheelchair users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9111455     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90227-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  9 in total

Review 1.  Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports.

Authors:  Y Vanlandewijck; D Theisen; D Daly
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Shoulder pain and jerk during recovery phase of manual wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Chandrasekaran Jayaraman; Carolyn L Beck; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Wheelchair ergonomic hand drive mechanism use improves wrist mechanics associated with carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Lisa A Zukowski; Jaimie A Roper; Orit Shechtman; Dana M Otzel; Patty W Hovis; Mark D Tillman
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

4.  Shoulder model validation and joint contact forces during wheelchair activities.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Shoulder demands in manual wheelchair users across a spectrum of activities.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Wendy J Hurd; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  A comparison of static and dynamic optimization muscle force predictions during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Melissa M Morrow; Jeffery W Rankin; Richard R Neptune; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  Upper-limb joint kinetics expression during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Wendy J Hurd; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2009

8.  Estimation of manual wheelchair-based activities in the free-living environment using a neural network model with inertial body-worn sensors.

Authors:  Emma Fortune; Beth A Cloud-Biebl; Stefan I Madansingh; Che G Ngufor; Meegan G Van Straaten; Brianna M Goodwin; Dennis H Murphree; Kristin D Zhao; Melissa M Morrow
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.368

9.  The effects of rear-wheel camber on the kinematics of upper extremity during wheelchair propulsion.

Authors:  Chung-Ying Tsai; Chien-Ju Lin; Yueh-Chu Huang; Po-Chou Lin; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.