Literature DB >> 9111376

Recent trends in utilization of procedures in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.

P D Manoukian1, J R Wyatt, D A Leopold, E B Bass.   

Abstract

The development of minimally invasive techniques and increasing performance of surgery in outpatient settings have had a major influence on otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OLHNS), but little is known about the extent to which these forces have affected the overall distribution and total rate of performance of OLHNS procedures. The aims of this study were to determine whether there has been a change in the total number of people undergoing OLHNS procedures between 1989 and 1992 in Maryland and to identify those procedures for which there has been a significant change in utilization. Data were obtained on 171,579 patients undergoing OLHNS procedures between 1989 and 1992 in Maryland's nonfederal, acute care hospitals, hospital-based outpatient centers, and freestanding multispecialty surgical centers. Age-adjusted annual surgical rates were calculated by direct standardization using 1990 Maryland census data, and changes in rates over time were examined using linear regression. From 1989 to 1992, there was no significant change in the total age-adjusted annual rate of performance of the most commonly performed OLHNS procedures (P>0.05), yet there was a significant increase (P<0.05) in the rates of ethmoidectomy from 37/100,000 to 73/100,000, intranasal antrotomy from 25/100,000 to 44/100,000, and septoplasty from 70/100,000 to 89/100,000, and a significant decrease (P>0.05) in the rate of rhinoplasty from 44/100,000 to 36/100,000. The data show an annual average decrease in inpatient surgery of 5.2% (P=0.006), and a corresponding increase in outpatient surgery of 5.1% (P=0.005). Maryland surgery rates for commonly performed procedures in OLHNS remained stable overall, except for an increase in sinus surgery and septoplasty rates and a decrease in rhinoplasty rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9111376     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199704000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  12 in total

1.  Computed nasal resistance compared with patient-reported symptoms in surgically treated nasal airway passages: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Julia S Kimbell; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank; Daniel E Cannon; Sachin S Pawar; John S Rhee
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.467

2.  Risk factors for intraoperative saddle nose deformity in septoplasty patients.

Authors:  Jung Joo Lee; Sang Duk Hong; Hun-Jong Dhong; Seung-Kyu Chung; Hyo Yeol Kim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Virtual septoplasty: a method to predict surgical outcomes for patients with nasal airway obstruction.

Authors:  Masoud Gh Moghaddam; Guilherme J M Garcia; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; John S Rhee
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Toward personalized nasal surgery using computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  John S Rhee; Sachin S Pawar; Guilherme J M Garcia; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2011-04-18

5.  Septoplasty versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction in adults with a deviated septum: economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M M H T van Egmond; J P C Grutters; G Hannink; N van Heerbeek; M M Rovers
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.

Authors:  Elysia M Grose; Connor P Holmes; Kaishan A Aravinthan; Vincent Wu; John M Lee
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-17

7.  Patient Perspectives on Removing Adult Tonsillectomy and Septoplasty from the Government Health Insurance Plan in a Publicly Funded Health Care System.

Authors:  Elysia Grose; Sarah Chiodo; Marc Levin; Antoine Eskander; Vincent Lin; Brad Hubbard; Albino Chiodo
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Effectiveness of septoplasty versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum in adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M M H T van Egmond; M M Rovers; C T M Hendriks; N van Heerbeek
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  The Common Clinical Presentation of Patients Selected for Septoplasty in Northern Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdullah D Alotaibi; Bassam Ahmed Almutlaq; Fahad Nashmi Alshammari; Hussain Gadelkarim Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-03

10.  The relationship between the Ottawa Valve Collapse Scale (OVCS) and clinical outcomes in septoplasty patients.

Authors:  Phillip Staibano; James P Bonaparte
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-03-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.