Literature DB >> 9110123

A head-to-head comparison of the cost effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibrates in different types of primary hyperlipidemia.

S Perreault1, V H Hamilton, F Lavoie, S Grover.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the lifetime cost-effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibrates for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Estimates of lipid modification achieved due to drug therapy were based on published head-to-head comparisons of specific HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibrates in randomized, double-blind studies. We used a validated coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention computer model to estimate the costs and benefits of lifelong lipid modification. The patients were middle-aged men and women who were free of CHD, with either primary type IIa or IIb hyperlipidemia. The intervention used were specific HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibrates at several dosages, which reduced total cholesterol 11-34% and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 1-29%. The main outcome measure was the cost per year of life saved after discounting benefits and costs by 5% annually. The lifetime cost effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin) and fibrates (bezafibrate, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil) for the treatment of primary hyperlipidemia varied according to patient population, the effectiveness of each drug in modifying lipid levels, and the price of each drug. The estimates of cost per year of life saved for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors range from $19,886 to $73,632, and $16,955 to $59,488 for fibrates according to gender and type of primary hyperlipidemia. Fluvastatin 20 mg/day was significantly more cost effective than gemfibrozil 1200 mg/day for male patients with type IIa hyperlipidemia. Simvastatin 17.3 mg/day or 20 mg/day yielded similar cost-effectiveness ratios compared with fibrates among type II hyperlipidemic patients. However, micronized fenofibrate was more cost effective than simvastatin 20 mg/day among type IIb patients. The cost effectiveness of lipid therapy varies widely and can be maximized by selecting specific drugs for specific lipid abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9110123     DOI: 10.1007/bf00053037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of statins in coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Oscar H Franco; Anna Peeters; Caspar W N Looman; Luc Bonneux
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Micronised fenofibrate: a review of its pharmacodynamic properties and clinical efficacy in the management of dyslipidaemia.

Authors:  J C Adkins; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Cost effectiveness of adding ezetimibe to atorvastatin therapy in patients not at cholesterol treatment goal in Canada.

Authors:  Michele Kohli; Cheryl Attard; Annette Lam; Daniel Huse; John Cook; Chantal Bourgault; Evo Alemao; Donald Yin; Michael Marentette
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Pravastatin. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  A J Coukell; M I Wilde
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Influence of fluvastatin on cardiac function and baroreflex sensitivity in diabetic rats.

Authors:  Fang Xie; Chao Sun; Li-hua Sun; Jing-yuan Li; Xin Chen; Hui Che; Guan-yi Lu; Bao-feng Yang; Jing Ai
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Cost effectiveness of treating low HDL-cholesterol in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Joel W Hay; Kimberly L Sterling
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Pharmacoeconomics of lipid-lowering agents for primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J W Hay; W M Yu; T Ashraf
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.