Literature DB >> 9109582

Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.

W N Wang1, C L Meng, T H Tarng.   

Abstract

Two types of chemically coated bases, two types of mechanical interlock base polycrystalline ceramic brackets, as well as one type of mechanical interlock base metal bracket were selected for bonding with Concise orthodontic resin on 60 extracted premolars. Bond strength was measured with an Instron testing machine and the debonded interface and enamel detachment were examined with scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer. The results showed the greater bond strength with a chemically coated base of ceramic brackets had a greater debonded interface between enamel and resin, and the weaker bond strength of mechanical interlock base of ceramic and metal brackets had a greater debonded interfaces between bracket and resin. There was no significant statistical difference in bond strengths with mechanically interlock bases between ceramic and metal brackets. The enamel detachment was found on only the stronger bond strength in which there was a chemically coated base on the ceramic bracket. Ceramic bracket fractures were not found during debonding in this specially designed specimen with 1 mm/min speed of crosshead. The mechanical interlock base of the ceramic bracket combines the strength, durability and retention of a metal bracket along with an aesthetic advantage and no enamel detachment after debonding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9109582     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)80019-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Reconditioning of ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Reza Fekrazad; Katayoun A M Kalhori; Mahshid Ramtin
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: Comparative In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohd Younus Ansari; Deepak K Agarwal; Ankur Gupta; Preeti Bhattacharya; Juhi Ansar; Ravi Bhandari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

3.  Effect of Er:YAG Laser and Sandblasting in Recycling of Ceramic Brackets.

Authors:  Soghra Yassaei; Hossein Aghili; Azadeh Hosseinzadeh Firouzabadi; Hamidreza Meshkani
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-01-08

4.  Does ultra-pulse CO(2) laser reduce the risk of enamel damage during debonding of ceramic brackets?

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Farzin Heravi; Reza Fekrazad; Fahimeh Farzanegan; Samaneh Nakhaei
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Quantitative analysis of mechanically retentive ceramic bracket base surfaces with a three-dimensional imaging system.

Authors:  Da-Young Kang; Sung-Hwan Choi; Jung-Yul Cha; Chung-Ju Hwang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Bracket base remnants after orthodontic debonding.

Authors:  Matteo Zanarini; Antonio Gracco; Monica Lattuca; Silvia Marchionni; Maria Rosaria Gatto; Giulio Alessandri Bonetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The use of the laser confocal scanning microscopy to measure resin remnants on customized lingual bracket.

Authors:  Can Kuskonmaz; Alberto De Stefani; Gilberto Artioli; Matteo Zanarini; Giulio Alessandri Bonetti; Giovanni Bruno; Antonio Gracco
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.757

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.