Literature DB >> 9108895

The pharmacoeconomics of dementia therapies. Bringing the clinical, research and economic perspectives together.

F J Molnar1, W B Dalziel.   

Abstract

Dementia has reached epidemic proportions. The large numbers of people affected and the major impact that this disease has on healthcare costs are still not fully appreciated by the general public, governments or healthcare providers. Prevalence rates are expected to continue to escalate because of the dramatic aging of the population in many nations. This could create serious economic problems for already strained healthcare systems around the world. Fortunately, medications suitable for widespread use appear to be on the horizon. As therapies are developed, it will be necessary to assess their impact on individuals, healthcare systems and societies. The latter two refer to pharmacoeconomic research, an area in which a careful examination of issues central to the design and interpretation of such analyses must now be undertaken. This article outlines the critical components in the application of pharmacoeconomic methodology to the field of dementia research. Specifically, the accuracy of a pharmacoeconomic study is affected by the prevalence data and the economic methodology used. The outcome measures used in efficacy, effectiveness and pharmacoeconomic studies must be carefully chosen to ensure that they are valid, reliable and sensitive to change. These measures must also be meaningful to patients, families and clinicians. In the future, dementia therapies may prevent, delay, cure or slow the progression of the disease, and may also help control symptoms. It is important to study the impact of these effects from the perspectives of the patient, family and society. Dementias are important in terms of the number of people affected and the degree of suffering experienced, as well as the considerable financial burdens placed on families and society. Pharmacoeconomic analyses will have a significant influence on healthcare decisions affecting people with dementia. To ensure that these future decisions are in the best interests of patients, families and society, clinical knowledge of dementias must be incorporated into the design of pharmacoeconomic studies. Collaboration between clinicians, researchers and economists is essential in assessing future pharmacotherapies for dementing illnesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9108895     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-199710030-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  35 in total

1.  Tacrine for Alzheimer's disease. Costs and benefits.

Authors:  D Knopman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Health care costs of older persons with cognitive impairments.

Authors:  T A Coughlin; K Liu
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1989-04

3.  Evaluation of the costs of caring for the senile demented elderly: a pilot study.

Authors:  T W Hu; L F Huang; W S Cartwright
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1986-04

4.  Use of global assessment measures in dementia drug trials.

Authors:  K Rockwood
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  Evaluation of pharmacoeconomic studies: utilization of a checklist.

Authors:  J A Sacristán; J Soto; I Galende
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 6.  Diagnosis of vascular dementia: Consortium of Canadian Centres for Clinical Cognitive Research concensus statement.

Authors:  K Rockwood; I Parhad; V Hachinski; T Erkinjuntti; B Rewcastle; A Kertesz; M R Eastwood; S Phillips
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.104

7.  The economic burden of Alzheimer's disease care.

Authors:  D P Rice; P J Fox; W Max; P A Webber; D A Lindeman; W W Hauck; E Segura
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  The economic cost of senile dementia in the United States, 1985.

Authors:  L F Huang; W S Cartwright; T W Hu
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  The costs of family contributions to the care of persons with dementia.

Authors:  M Stommel; C E Collins; B A Given
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1994-04

10.  Randomized clinical trial of daily aspirin therapy in multi-infarct dementia. A pilot study.

Authors:  J S Meyer; R L Rogers; K McClintic; K F Mortel; J Lotfi
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Donepezil. Pharmacoeconomic implications of therapy.

Authors:  R H Foster; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Classification, diagnosis and treatment of vascular dementia.

Authors:  S Konno; J S Meyer; Y Terayama; G M Margishvili; K F Mortel
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Galantamine: a review of its use in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  L J Scott; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Cost effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: a review with methodological considerations.

Authors:  Anders Wimo
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.