Literature DB >> 9108359

Microdamage of human cortical bone: incidence and morphology in long bones.

T L Norman1, Z Wang.   

Abstract

Increased bone fragility and osteoporotic fracture in human bone has been attributed to the accumulation of microdamage. According to Martin and Burr (J Biomech 15:137-139; 1982), microcracks from interstitial bone propagate to the cement line or concentric lamellae and debond or separate the Haversian canal from the surrounding bone which leads to repair of the damaged region. If this is true, we would expect to find a greater incidence of microdamage existing at the cement line than at other locations within the bone microstructure. The incidence of such an occurrence, however, is not established. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the incidence and morphology of microcracks in human cortical bone from the midshaft of the tibia and proximal femur. We investigated the hypothesis that osteons arrest and trap microcracks in bone. We were also interested in determining if relationships exist between microdamage and bone type (tibia or femur), cortex location (anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral), gender, and donor age. It was found that 62.4% of all microcracks run between the surrounding interstitial bone and the cement line supporting the hypothesis by Martin and Burr. It was also found that microdamage increased with age, was significantly greater in females than males, and was significantly greater in the proximal femur than the midshaft of the tibia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9108359     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00004-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  40 in total

Review 1.  Microdamage and bone strength.

Authors:  David Burr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Relationships between in vivo microdamage and the remarkable regional material and strain heterogeneity of cortical bone of adult deer, elk, sheep and horse calcanei.

Authors:  John G Skedros; Christian L Sybrowsky; Wm Erick Anderson; Frank Chow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 3.  Microcracks in cortical bone: how do they affect bone biology?

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; Orlaith Brennan; Oran D Kennedy; T Clive Lee
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Black bear femoral geometry and cortical porosity are not adversely affected by ageing despite annual periods of disuse (hibernation).

Authors:  Meghan E McGee; Danielle L Miller; Janene Auger; Hal L Black; Seth W Donahue
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  The role of osteocytes and bone microstructure in preventing osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Jan G Hazenberg; David Taylor; T Clive Lee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Multiscale imaging of bone microdamage.

Authors:  Atharva A Poundarik; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.417

7.  Hierarchy of Bone Microdamage at Multiple Length Scales.

Authors:  Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Int J Fatigue       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.186

8.  Methodological approach for the detection of both microdamage and fluorochrome labels in ewe bone and human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Brigitte Burt-Pichat; Hélène Follet; Gwendoline Toulemonde; Monique Arlot; Pierre Delmas; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Fluorescence-aided detection of microdamage in compact bone.

Authors:  T C Lee; E R Myers; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Probabilistic failure analysis of bone using a finite element model of mineral-collagen composites.

Authors:  X Neil Dong; Teja Guda; Harry R Millwater; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.