Literature DB >> 9107375

Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions: a comparative study in children.

H Pancherz1, K Zieber, B Hoyer.   

Abstract

A comparison of dentoskeletal morphology in 347 Class II division 1 and 156 Class II division 2 malocclusions was performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs. Children at the ages of 8-10 years and 11-13 years were evaluated. The results of the study revealed broad variations in the variables analyzed. Skeletal Class II and Class III as well as hypo- and hyperdivergent maxillary/mandibular jaw base relationships were seen in both malocclusion samples. Noteworthy was the high frequency of cases with mandibular retrusion (Class II division 1 sample: 48% of the younger and 29% of the older subjects; Class II division 2 sample: 48% of the younger and 49% of the older subjects) and a short lower face (97%-100%). In conclusion it can be said that, except for the position of the maxillary incisors, no basic difference in dentoskeletal morphology exists between Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9107375     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0111:CCOCID>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  20 in total

1.  The tooth-width relation of the incisors in closed bite.

Authors:  G Schuster
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Cephalometric characteristics of Class II division 1 malocclusion in a Saudi population living in the western region.

Authors:  Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2010-11-02

Review 3.  Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vasileios F Zymperdikas; Vasiliki Koretsi; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Moschos A Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Short-term dentoskeletal changes following Class II treatment using a fixed functional appliance: the Austro Repositioner : A pilot study.

Authors:  M Dolores Austro; Encarnación González; M Angustias Peñalver; Domingo Pérez; José Antonio Alarcón
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Effects of the advanced mandibular spring on mandibular retrognathia treatment: a three-dimensional finite element study.

Authors:  Cheng Zhu; Ruomei Li; Lingjun Yuan; Yikan Zheng; Yu Jin; Hairui Li; Chao Liu; Lunguo Xia; Bing Fang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.747

6.  Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lina M Moreno Uribe; Sara C Howe; Colleen Kummet; Kaci C Vela; Deborah V Dawson; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  The relationship between vertical facial morphology and overjet in untreated Class II subjects.

Authors:  Humam Saltaji; Carlos Flores-Mir; Paul W Major; Mohamed Youssef
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Does Appliance Design Affect Treatment Outcomes of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion? A Two-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Burçin Akan; Türkan Sezen Erhamza
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  Morphological features of Class I, II and III malocclusions of Saudi adolescents.

Authors:  Khalid H Zawawi; Fahad F Alsulaimani; Ayman A Al-Dharrab; Ahmed R Afify; Mohammad S Al-Zahrani; Hosam A Baeshen
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Establishing Cephalometric Norms using Sagittal and Vertical Occlusal Cephalometric Analysis of Pancherz for Dakshina Kannada Children.

Authors:  M Sahitya; E P Shashidhar; G C Chidanandeswara; Sharath Kumar B Shetty; Y Mahesh Kumar
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.