Literature DB >> 9106693

Does preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal therapist affect outcome?

E M Bass1, A Del Pino, A Tan, R K Pearl, C P Orsay, H Abcarian.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is generally accepted that preoperative patient education and skin marking for a stoma location are important in avoiding stoma complications. At our institution, enterostomal therapists are available to educate and mark patients before their surgery. However, for various reasons, not all patients who had an elective stoma created, had preoperative skin marking or instructions on stoma care. Our registry of patients provided us with a means of comparing patients who have undergone an elective stoma with (Group I) and without (Group II) preoperative marking and education.
METHODS: Our stoma registry consisting of 1,790 patients was retrospectively reviewed from 1978 to 1996 to assess all patients who underwent elective stoma construction. Patients included for review had a total of 593 elective stomas. All patients with stomas are followed by the enterostomal therapists postoperatively and, therefore, were evaluated for both early and late complications. Early complications were defined as any adverse event occurring within 30 days of surgery and late complications as those occurring 30 days after surgery.
RESULTS: Our enterostomal therapists preoperatively evaluated 292 of the 593 patients planned for possible stoma creation. This included careful marking of the stoma site by having the patients lie down, sit, and stand and locating a stable flat area on the abdomen, taking into account the belt line and any abnormal skin creases or deformities. Patients were instructed on stoma appearance with a model and given basic stoma care instructions. In Group I, there were 95 (32.5 percent) complications (68 (23.3 percent) occurred early and 27 (9.25 percent) occurred late). There were 301 patients who did not receive preoperative evaluation (Group II). In this second group, 131 (43.5 percent) complications were found, (95 (31.6 percent) occurred early and 36 (12 percent) occurred late). The difference in total number of complications between groups was determined to be statistically significant, with a P value of <0.0075, as was the difference in early complications, with a P value of <0.03. The difference in late complications is not significant, with a P value of <0.34.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that preoperative evaluation by an enterostomal therapist, marking of the skin site, and providing patient education reduce adverse outcomes. All elective procedures that may result in stoma formation should, therefore, be assessed and marked preoperatively. Patients, likewise, should be informed and taught to care for their forthcoming stomas preoperatively and postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9106693     DOI: 10.1007/bf02258389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  20 in total

1.  Early complications after stoma formation: a prospective cohort study in 100 patients with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  H A Formijne Jonkers; W A Draaisma; A M Roskott; A J van Overbeeke; I A M J Broeders; E C J Consten
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Early stomal complications.

Authors:  Brian R Kann
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

3.  Total mesorectal excision: what are we doing?

Authors:  David B Stewart; David W Dietz
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

4.  Late stomal complications.

Authors:  Syed G Husain; Thomas E Cataldo
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-02

Review 5.  Ostomy-Related Complications.

Authors:  Douglas R Murken; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-04-02

6.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  [Short version of the German S3 guideline for bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Retz; J E Gschwend; P Maisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults.

Authors:  F Ferrara; D Parini; A Bondurri; M Veltri; M Barbierato; F Pata; F Cattaneo; A Tafuri; C Forni; G Roveron; G Rizzo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Complication rates of ostomy surgery are high and vary significantly between hospitals.

Authors:  Kyle H Sheetz; Seth A Waits; Robert W Krell; Arden M Morris; Michael J Englesbe; Andrew Mullard; Darrell A Campbell; Samantha Hendren
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  Avoidance and management of stomal complications.

Authors:  Michael Kwiatt; Michitaka Kawata
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.