Literature DB >> 9106594

Do-not-resuscitate decisions in the medical ICU: comparing physician and nurse opinions.

A H Eliasson1, R S Howard, K G Torrington, T A Dillard, Y Y Phillips.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine how soon after admission to a medical ICU physicians and nurses decide that attempts at resuscitation are inappropriate and how frequently physicians and nurses disagree about do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decisions.
DESIGN: Prospective, opinion survey of care providers.
SETTING: Ten-bed adult medical ICU in a university-affiliated tertiary care referral hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult medical ICU admissions.
INTERVENTIONS: Over 10 months, physicians and nurses were surveyed independently every day regarding their opinions about DNR issues on each patient in the ICU. MEASUREMENTS: ICU day when DNR order was deemed appropriate by either physicians or nurses.
RESULTS: Of 368 consecutive admissions, 84 (23%) patients were designated DNR during their ICU stay. In 6 of these 84 cases (7%), the responsible nurse did not agree that DNR orders were appropriate. In the remaining 78 patients designated DNR, the median time for physicians to recommend DNR (median, 1 day; range, 0 to 22 days) was not significantly different from the median time for nurses (median, 1 day; range, 0 to 13 days); (p=0.45). For the 284 patients not designated DNR, physicians and nurses both believed DNR was appropriate in 14 cases (5%), but a DNR order was not written five times (2%) because there was not time to do so and nine times (3%) because patient or family did not concur. Physicians and nurses disagreed about a DNR recommendation in 33 of the 284 patients not designated DNR (12%). Physicians were more likely to believe that DNR was appropriate than were nurses (p<0.0005), with physicians alone recommending DNR 29 times (10%) and nurses alone favoring DNR in four cases (1%).
CONCLUSIONS: At our institution, recognition of DNR appropriateness by nurses and physicians occurs over a similar time frame. However, physicians are more likely to recommend DNR in cases of disagreement between nurses and physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9106594     DOI: 10.1378/chest.111.4.1106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  7 in total

1.  Knowledge, Attitude and Decision-making of Nurses in the Resuscitation Team towards Terminating Resuscitation and Do-not-Resuscitate Order.

Authors:  Afshin Goodarzi; Efat Sadeghian; Keivan Babaei; Masoud Khodaveisi
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003.

Authors:  Jean Carlet; Lambertus G Thijs; Massimo Antonelli; Joan Cassell; Peter Cox; Nicholas Hill; Charles Hinds; Jorge Manuel Pimentel; Konrad Reinhart; Boyd Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Understanding End-of-Life Preferences: Predicting Life-Prolonging Treatment Preferences Among Community-Dwelling Older Americans.

Authors:  Allison B Brenner; Lesli E Skolarus; Chithra R Perumalswami; James F Burke
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Respiratory support withdrawal in intensive care units: families, physicians and nurses views on two hypothetical clinical scenarios.

Authors:  Renata R L Fumis; Daniel Deheinzelin
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Sepsis-related organ failure assessment and withholding or withdrawing life support from critically ill patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Intensive Care Unit Physician's Attitudes on Do Not Resuscitate Order in Palestine.

Authors:  Fatima S Abdallah; Mahdy S Radaeda; Maram K Gaghama; Basma Salameh
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

7.  Prognostication in acutely admitted older patients by nurses and physicians.

Authors:  Bianca M Buurman; Barbara C van Munster; Johanna C Korevaar; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Marcel Levi; Sophia E de Rooij
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 5.128

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.