Literature DB >> 9106121

Effect of coil position and stimulus intensity in transcranial magnetic stimulation on human brain.

K Kaneko1, Y Fuchigami, H Morita, A Ofuji, S Kawai.   

Abstract

Evoked spinal cord potentials (ESCPs) from the cervical and high thoracic epidural space following transcranial magnetic stimulation were recorded from eight subjects in awake and anesthetized condition. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the right abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and rectus femoris (RF) muscles were simultaneously recorded during voluntary contraction. The stimulus intensity was at 30% above the MEPs threshold of the ADM when the coil center was fixed on 10-20 international Cz position. In awake condition, multiple ESCP components (greater than 3) were recorded from the cervical epidural space but no or minimal components were recorded from the upper thoracic epidural space. When the coil was moved anteriorly so that the posterior edge of the coil was positioned on Cz, the amplitude of the first ESCP component was significantly increased (P < 0.02) and shortened (not significant) at cervical levels. In addition, several ESCP components were more evident at high thoracic levels. Although the amplitude of the ADM was not enhanced, that of the RF was enhanced. During general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics (sevoflurane), only the first component of the ESCPs (D-wave) was elicited. Its amplitude was enhanced (P < 0.02) when the coil edge was fixed on Cz, similar to results in awake condition. This enhancement of the first ESCP component was accompanied by enhancement of those recorded from the high thoracic epidural space. However the amplitude of D-wave was the same in the two different coil positions when the stimulus intensity was set a 100% of the output. These results suggest that at low stimulus intensity, positioning the coil edge on Cz is optimal in inducing D-wave effectively but at high stimulus intensity, D-wave generation can be achieved in either if the two different coil position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9106121     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)05324-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  2 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Assessment of Neurodegenerative Disease.

Authors:  Steve Vucic; Matthew C Kiernan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Extramuscular Recording of Spontaneous EMG Activity and Transcranial Electrical Elicited Motor Potentials in Horses: Characteristics of Different Subcutaneous and Surface Electrode Types and Practical Guidelines.

Authors:  Sanne Lotte Journée; Henricus Louis Journée; Stephen Michael Reed; Hanneke Irene Berends; Cornelis Marinus de Bruijn; Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.677

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.