Literature DB >> 9105931

Comparative study of the protective effect against Salmonella colonisation in newly hatched SPF chickens using live, attenuated Salmonella vaccine strains, wild-type Salmonella strains or a competitive exclusion product.

U Methner1, P A Barrow, G Martin, H Meyer.   

Abstract

There is a need to prevent intestinal colonisation by Salmonella enteritidis and S. typhimurium in newly hatched chicks. Treatment with an undefined bacterial flora is not acceptable to regulatory agencies in some countries because of the potential risk of transmitting pathogens. A defined culture with a potency and stability equivalent to those of an undefined culture has not yet been developed. Since attenuated Salmonella vaccine strains could possess the colonisation characteristics but not the virulence of Salmonella wild-type strains, they could inhibit colonisation of the challenge organism. S. typhimurium live vaccines registered in Germany (Zoosaloral H, Salmonella vac T), S. enteritidis aroA and S. typhimurium aroA strains, S. enteritidis, S. typhimurium and S. infantis wild-type strains or a competitive exclusion product (Broilact) were used as pretreatment cultures and evaluated for their inhibitory effects against S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium colonisation in newly hatched SPF chickens. Day-old chicks were administered a pretreatment culture and infected orally with variants of S. enteritidis or S. typhimurium wild type-strains resistant to nalidixic acid or rifampicin 1 day after pretreatment. On days 2 and 6 after infection, viable numbers of the challenge strain in liver and caeca were determined. The results for birds pretreated with Broilact showed a distinct protective effect against both S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium at a challenge dose of 10(4) cfu/bird. After pretreatment of chicks with S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium wild-type strains, the greatest degree of inhibition of caecal colonisation was produced using isogenic strains. Colonisation after infection with non-isogenic strains could not be prevented but only reduced for a brief period. These effects were also observed after administration of aroA strains of S. enteritidis and S. typhimurium but the protective effect was considerably lower than after pretreatment with wild-type Salmonella strains. Inoculation with attenuated S. typhimurium vaccines resulted in a weak but significantly reduced colonisation by S. typhimurium. Colonisation by S. enteritidis could not be diminished by either of the S. typhimurium vaccine strains. The results indicate in principle the potency of Salmonella vaccine strains to inhibit Salmonella wild-type colonisation in newly hatched chicks. Potential vaccine candidates should be tested for their capacity to prevent intestinal colonisation in newly hatched chicks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9105931     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1605(96)01236-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  9 in total

1.  Important Metabolic Pathways and Biological Processes Expressed by Chicken Cecal Microbiota.

Authors:  Ondrej Polansky; Zuzana Sekelova; Marcela Faldynova; Alena Sebkova; Frantisek Sisak; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Immune response of chicken gut to natural colonization by gut microflora and to Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis infection.

Authors:  Magdalena Crhanova; Helena Hradecka; Marcela Faldynova; Marta Matulova; Hana Havlickova; Frantisek Sisak; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Rapid protection of gnotobiotic pigs against experimental salmonellosis following induction of polymorphonuclear leukocytes by avirulent Salmonella enterica.

Authors:  N Foster; M A Lovell; K L Marston; S D Hulme; A J Frost; P Bland; P A Barrow
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 4.  Attenuating gene expression (AGE) for vaccine development.

Authors:  David W Pascual; Zhiyong Suo; Ling Cao; Recep Avci; Xinghong Yang
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 5.882

5.  Influence of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection on the composition of chicken cecal microbiota.

Authors:  Petra Videnska; Frantisek Sisak; Hana Havlickova; Marcela Faldynova; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Succession and replacement of bacterial populations in the caecum of egg laying hens over their whole life.

Authors:  Petra Videnska; Karel Sedlar; Maja Lukac; Marcela Faldynova; Lenka Gerzova; Darina Cejkova; Frantisek Sisak; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Composition and Function of Chicken Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 8.  Non-Antibiotics Strategies to Control Salmonella Infection in Poultry.

Authors:  José Martín Ruvalcaba-Gómez; Zuamí Villagrán; Juan José Valdez-Alarcón; Marcelino Martínez-Núñez; Lorena Jacqueline Gomez-Godínez; Edmundo Ruesga-Gutiérrez; Luis Miguel Anaya-Esparza; Ramón Ignacio Arteaga-Garibay; Angélica Villarruel-López
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Transient and Prolonged Response of Chicken Cecum Mucosa to Colonization with Different Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Jiri Volf; Ondrej Polansky; Karolina Varmuzova; Lenka Gerzova; Zuzana Sekelova; Marcela Faldynova; Vladimir Babak; Matej Medvecky; Adrian L Smith; Bernd Kaspers; Philippe Velge; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.