Literature DB >> 9102229

Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPA-R): one potential characteristic of metastatic phenotypes in minimal residual tumor disease.

H Allgayer1, M M Heiss, R Riesenberg, K U Grützner, A Tarabichi, R Babic, F W Schildberg.   

Abstract

Evidence of dynamic development of cytokeratin (CK) 18-positive disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow of curatively resected cancer patients has implicated a subclinical minimal residual disease as a biologically relevant component in solid cancer. However, differentiation between irrelevant shed cells and those cells potentially capable of causing later recurrence has not yet been made. In parallel, accumulating data show functional association of the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) system and the membranous uPA receptor (uPA-R) with the capacity of a tumor cell for invasion and metastasis. The present study was designed to find descriptive evidence in vivo concerning whether uPA-R could be one potential characteristic for metastatically relevant phenotypes of disseminated tumor cells. An immunocytochemical double staining for uPA-R and CK18 (immunogold/alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase) was performed on perioperative and follow-up bone marrow aspirations of 78 curatively resected gastric cancer patients, if positive tumor cell status had been shown previously with the single alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase method. Bone marrow cells (10(6)) were examined in each assay. Postoperative qualitative and quantitative development of uPA-R-expressing disseminated tumor cells was followed in relation to uPA-R-negative cells and correlated with later clinical relapse. Double staining could be performed perioperatively or in follow-up, or both, in 58 of 78 patients. Expression of uPA-R on perioperatively disseminated tumor cells significantly correlated with later quantitative increases of tumor cells (P = 0.0009). Overall median tumor cell numbers with uPA-R expression significantly increased during follow-up from a median value of 5.5 to 10.0 in 10(6) cells (P = 0.008), and the mean relative percentage of uPA-R-positive, compared with uPA-R-negative, disseminated tumor cells also increased, from 47.9% at surgery to 68.6% in follow-up (P < 0.001). This was mainly due to patients with later tumor relapse (increase from 63.9 to 80.7%, P = 0.001). Patients without relapse showed slight increases at lower percentage levels (5.7% at surgery, 7.4% in follow-up). Differences for relapsing patients were significant (surgery, P = 0.006; follow-up, P < 0.001). Our results suggest from an in vivo model that uPA-R may be one antigen that enables identification and follow-up observations of metastatically relevant phenotypes of disseminated tumor cells, differentiating their individual potential for causing relapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9102229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  16 in total

1.  [PET-CT studies of metastasizing cancer of the colon and rectum. Variability of tumor aggressiveness as a micro-evolutionary process of cancer stem cells with predetermined prognosis].

Authors:  F Stelzner; D von Mallek; J Ruhlmann; H J Biersack
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Enhancement of type IV collagenases by highly metastatic variants of HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells established by a transendothelial invasion system in vitro.

Authors:  T Okada; J Li; M Kodaka; H Okuno
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 3.  Hypoxia and Bone Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Rachelle W Johnson; Miranda E Sowder; Amato J Giaccia
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Clinical value of extended biologic staging by bone marrow micrometastases and tumor-associated proteases in gastric cancer.

Authors:  M M Heiss; H Allgayer; K U Gruetzner; R Babic; K W Jauch; F W Schildberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The problem of cancer dormancy: understanding the basic mechanisms and identifying therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Heterogeneous proliferative potential of occult metastatic cells in bone marrow of patients with solid epithelial tumors.

Authors:  Oender Solakoglu; Christine Maierhofer; Georgia Lahr; Elisabeth Breit; Peter Scheunemann; Isabella Heumos; Uwe Pichlmeier; Gunter Schlimok; Ralph Oberneder; Manfred W Kollermann; Jens Kollermann; Michael R Speicher; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy.

Authors:  Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Massive infiltration of bone marrow in colon carcinoma after treatment with activated protein C.

Authors:  Lisa Pleyer; Philip Went; Gudrun Russ; Erika Prinz; Viktoria Faber; Hans-Joachim Röwert; Renate Karlbauer; Richard Greil
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Hematogenous tumor cell dissemination during colonoscopy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Koch; P Kienle; P Sauer; F Willeke; K Buhl; A Benner; T Lehnert; C Herfarth; M von Knebel Doeberitz; J Weitz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The urokinase receptor (u-PAR)--a link between tumor cell dormancy and minimal residual disease in bone marrow?

Authors:  Heike Allgayer; Julio A Aguirre-Ghiso
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.