M P Spencer1. 1. Institute of Applied Physiology and Medicine, Seattle, WA 98122, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The value of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) depends on the safety of the operation. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) was used to evaluate the possibilities of hypoperfusion, hyperperfusion, and embolization as causes of stroke and to evaluate the significance of Doppler microembolic signals (DMES). METHODS: Five hundred CEAs were monitored with TCD of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery during various phases of CEA to determine hemodynamic changes and incidence of DMES. Complications were graded according to their severity, and their probable cause was determined from TCD criteria and review of hospital charts. RESULTS: We observed 24 cerebrovascular complications (4.8%), including 9 with transient ischemic attacks and 15 (3%) with permanent deficits. Among all cerebrovascular complications, embolism was judged to be responsible in 13 (54%; P < .02 compared with hypoperfusion), hyperperfusion in 7 (29%; P < .14 compared with hypoperfusion), and hypoperfusion in 4 (17%; P < .08 compared with embolism plus hyperperfusion). The surgeons responded to TCD information by several strategies depending on the TCD information. The incidence of permanent deficits diminished from 7% in the first 100 operations to 2% in the last 400 (P < or = .01). Shunting was more strongly associated with cerebrovascular complications than nonshunting, but this difference was not significant (P = .24). Intraoperative prevalence of DMES was strongly associated with cerebrovascular complications (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Embolism is the principal cause of cerebrovascular complications from CEA; hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion are also important causes. TCD provides information that allows prompt identification and treatment of these three major causes of stroke from this operation. The perioperative stroke rate can be reduced by appropriate measures, taken by the surgeons, based on findings of TCD monitoring.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The value of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) depends on the safety of the operation. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) was used to evaluate the possibilities of hypoperfusion, hyperperfusion, and embolization as causes of stroke and to evaluate the significance of Doppler microembolic signals (DMES). METHODS: Five hundred CEAs were monitored with TCD of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery during various phases of CEA to determine hemodynamic changes and incidence of DMES. Complications were graded according to their severity, and their probable cause was determined from TCD criteria and review of hospital charts. RESULTS: We observed 24 cerebrovascular complications (4.8%), including 9 with transient ischemic attacks and 15 (3%) with permanent deficits. Among all cerebrovascular complications, embolism was judged to be responsible in 13 (54%; P < .02 compared with hypoperfusion), hyperperfusion in 7 (29%; P < .14 compared with hypoperfusion), and hypoperfusion in 4 (17%; P < .08 compared with embolism plus hyperperfusion). The surgeons responded to TCD information by several strategies depending on the TCD information. The incidence of permanent deficits diminished from 7% in the first 100 operations to 2% in the last 400 (P < or = .01). Shunting was more strongly associated with cerebrovascular complications than nonshunting, but this difference was not significant (P = .24). Intraoperative prevalence of DMES was strongly associated with cerebrovascular complications (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS:Embolism is the principal cause of cerebrovascular complications from CEA; hyperperfusion and hypoperfusion are also important causes. TCD provides information that allows prompt identification and treatment of these three major causes of stroke from this operation. The perioperative stroke rate can be reduced by appropriate measures, taken by the surgeons, based on findings of TCD monitoring.
Authors: K Kimura; K Minematsu; K Wada; M Yasaka; M Tagaya; S Kuribayashi; T Yamaguchi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: K Kimura; K Minematsu; M Koga; R Arakawa; M Yasaka; H Yamagami; K Nagatsuka; H Naritomi; T Yamaguchi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001 Jun-Jul Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert H Bonow; Cordelie E Witt; Bryan P Mosher; Mahmud Mossa-Basha; Monica S Vavilala; Frederick P Rivara; Joseph Cuschieri; Saman Arbabi; Randall M Chesnut Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Holger Poppert; Oliver Wolf; Markus Resch; Wolfram Theiss; Till Schmidt-Thieme; Helga Graefin von Einsiedel; Peter Heider; Stefan Martinoff; Dirk Sander Journal: J Neurol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Kristin K Martin; Jeremy B Wigginton; Viken L Babikian; Val E Pochay; Michael D Crittenden; James L Rudolph Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2008-08-23 Impact factor: 2.565