Literature DB >> 9098506

Subnasoalveolar anatomy and hominoid phylogeny: evidence from comparative ontogeny.

M A McCollum1, S C Ward.   

Abstract

The present analysis evaluated extant hominoid subnasal morphological variation from an ontogenetic perspective, documenting both qualitative and allometric details of subnasal maturation in Hylobates, great apes and modern humans. With respect to intraspecific variation, results of log-linear modeling procedures indicate that qualitative features of the subnasal region shown previously to discriminate extant taxa (Ward and Kimbel, 1983; McCollum et al., 1993) do not vary appreciably with either age or sex. In terms of quantitative variation, aside from observed changes in the position of the anterior attachment of the nasal septal cartilage relative to the lateral margins of the nasal cavity, the morphology of the subnasal region does not vary appreciably with age. Furthermore, it was found that sexual dimorphism in subnasal form is present only in Pongo and Gorilla and is the result of sexual bimaturism rather than sexual variation in canine size. In considering interspecific variation in subnasal form, there is a propensity among hominoid taxa for the nasal cavity floor to be free of substantial topographic relief. The smoothly continuous nasal floor topography identified in the majority of hominoid taxa appears to be produced by extensive resorption of the anterior nasal cavity floor that accompanies an upward rotation of the anterior maxilla during craniofacial ontogeny. Comparisons of ontogenetic allometric trajectories indicate that relatively little of the variation in hominoid subnasal form can early be attributed to variation in body/cranial size. Instead, variation in craniofacial orientation, vascular anatomy and incisor size and inclination were identified as potential mediators of hominoid subnasoalveolar anatomy. Although results of this analysis confirm that many detail of the orangutan subnasal morphology are derived for this taxon, there is only little conclusive evidence to support recent reports that the morphology displayed by Gorilla is primitive for great apes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9098506     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199703)102:3<377::AID-AJPA7>3.0.CO;2-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  5 in total

Review 1.  The facial skeleton of the chimpanzee-human last common ancestor.

Authors:  Samuel N Cobb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in baboon cranial morphology.

Authors:  Charles C Roseman; Katherine E Willmore; Jeffrey Rogers; Charles Hildebolt; Brooke E Sadler; Joan T Richtsmeier; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Postnatal changes in the growth dynamics of the human face revealed from bone modelling patterns.

Authors:  Cayetana Martinez-Maza; Antonio Rosas; Manuel Nieto-Díaz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Facial orientation and facial shape in extant great apes: a geometric morphometric analysis of covariation.

Authors:  Dimitri Neaux; Franck Guy; Emmanuel Gilissen; Walter Coudyzer; Patrick Vignaud; Stéphane Ducrocq
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Biometric evidence that sexual selection has shaped the hominin face.

Authors:  Eleanor M Weston; Adrian E Friday; Pietro Liò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.