Literature DB >> 9098299

A comparison of pressure patching versus no patching for corneal abrasions due to trauma or foreign body removal. Corneal Abrasion Patching Study Group.

P K Kaiser1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of pressure patching in the treatment of noninfected, noncontact lens-related traumatic corneal abrasions and abrasions secondary to removal of corneal foreign bodies.
METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three patients with noninfected, noncontact lens-related traumatic or foreign body removal-related corneal abrasions were followed daily after receiving topical antibiotics and mydriatics and after being randomized to receive either a pressure patch or no patch.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were excluded from the study. For data analysis, the remaining patients were split into two sections: those with traumatic corneal abrasions (120 patients) and those with corneal abrasions secondary to removal of corneal foreign bodies (81 patients). Patients with traumatic corneal abrasions healed significantly faster, had less pain, and had fewer reports of blurred vision" when they were not wearing a patch. The amount of photophobia, tearing, and foreign body sensation were similar between the patch and no-patch groups. Similarly, for corneal abrasions due to removal of foreign bodies, patients healed significantly faster and had less pain when they were not wearing a patch. There was no difference in the amount of photophobia, tearing, foreign body sensation, or blurred vision. Finally, there was better compliance in the no-patch group.
CONCLUSIONS: Noninfected, noncontact lens-related traumatic corneal abrasions as well as abrasions secondary to foreign body removal can be treated with antibiotic ointment and mydriatics alone without the need for a pressure patch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9098299     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30772-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Is a tight patch necessary after trabeculectomy?

Authors:  G E Trope; Y M Buys; J Flanagan; L Wang
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Myth: corneal abrasions require routine patching.

Authors:  C Soli; M E Herbert
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-03

Review 3.  Towards evidence based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Eye patches and corneal abrasion.

Authors:  K Mackway-Jones
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-03

4.  Ophthaproblem. Corneal abrasion.

Authors:  S Sharma
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  A sticky sight: cyanoacrylate 'superglue' injuries of the eye.

Authors:  Imran H Yusuf; C K Patel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 6.  Diabetic keratopathy: Insights and challenges.

Authors:  S Priyadarsini; A Whelchel; S Nicholas; R Sharif; K Riaz; D Karamichos
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Corneal abrasion.

Authors:  Scott Fraser
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-06

Review 8.  Controversies in ocular trauma classification and management: review.

Authors:  Rupesh Agrawal; Mehul Shah; Kamiar Mireskandari; Goh Kong Yong
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Management of traumatic corneal abrasion by a sample of practicing ophthalmologists in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ghadah S Al-Saleh; Abdullah M Alfawaz
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.