Literature DB >> 9097913

Synergistic mechanisms by which sirolimus and cyclosporin inhibit rat heart and kidney allograft rejection.

S M Stepkowski1, L Tian, K L Napoli, R Ghobrial, M E Wang, T C Chou, B D Kahan.   

Abstract

The studies presented herein examined the mechanism(s) whereby sirolimus (SRL) and cyclosporin (CsA) act synergistically to block allograft rejection. Combination index (CI = 1 reflects additive, CI > 1 antagonistic, and CI < 1 synergistic, effects) analysis documented potent synergism between SRL and CsA to block allograft rejection. Combinations of the two drugs produced synergistic prolongation of heart (CI = 0.001-0.2) or kidney (CI = 0.03-0.5) allograft survival at SRL/CsA ratios ranging from 1:12.5 to 1:200. Pharmacokinetic analysis of the individual drugs showed that CsA does not affect the blood levels of SRL, and SRL mildly increases the levels of CsA in SRL/CsA-treated rats. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis was used to document that both subtherapeutic (1.0 mg/kg) and therapeutic (2.0 or 4.0 mg/kg) CsA doses inhibited the expression of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) (P < 0.03) and IL-2 (P < 0.003) mRNA produced by T helper (Th) 1 cells, as well as IL-10 (P < 0.001), but not IL-4 (NS) mRNA produced by Th2 cells. Contrariwise, all tested SRL doses (0.02, 0.04 or 0.08 mg/kg) did not affect cytokine mRNA expression. However, heart allografts from rat recipients treated with synergistic SRL/CsA doses displayed reduced levels of IFN-gamma (P < 0.01), IL-2 (P < 0.001) and IL-10 (P < 0.001) mRNA. Thus, because subtherapeutic doses of CsA reduce Th1/Th2 activity, thereby facilitating the inhibition of signal transduction by low does of SRL, the two agents act synergistically to inhibit allograft rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9097913      PMCID: PMC1904622          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1997.d01-984.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol        ISSN: 0009-9104            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  [New immunosuppressive agents for treating psoriasis].

Authors:  S Ortiz-Urda; K Rappersberger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-02-18       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 2.  A pharmacologic perspective on newly emerging T-cell manipulation technologies.

Authors:  Dominic Smethurst
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  The effect of cyclosporin A, FK506 and rapamycin on the murine contact sensitivity reaction.

Authors:  A Salerno; C T Bonanno; N Caccamo; D Cigna; R Dominici; C Ferro; G Sireci; F Dieli
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Influence of combined treatment of low dose rapamycin and cyclosporin A on corneal allograft survival.

Authors:  Svetlana Stanojlovic; Stephan Schlickeiser; Christine Appelt; Katrin Vogt; Isabela Schmitt-Knosalla; Stefanie Haase; Thomas Ritter; Birgit Sawitzki; Uwe Pleyer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Tumor growth effects of rapamycin on human biliary tract cancer cells.

Authors:  Matthias Heuer; Nici M Dreger; Vito R Cicinnati; Christian Fingas; Benjamin Juntermanns; Andreas Paul; Gernot M Kaiser
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  Target of rapamycin inhibitors (TOR-I; sirolimus and everolimus) for primary immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Deirdre Hahn; Elisabeth M Hodson; Lorraine A Hamiwka; Vincent Ws Lee; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig; Angela C Webster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-16

7.  Everolimus and sirolimus in combination with cyclosporine have different effects on renal metabolism in the rat.

Authors:  Rahul Bohra; Wenzel Schöning; Jelena Klawitter; Nina Brunner; Volker Schmitz; Touraj Shokati; Ryan Lawrence; Maria Fernanda Arbelaez; Björn Schniedewind; Uwe Christians; Jost Klawitter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.