Literature DB >> 9097329

Changes in equivalent and gradient refractive index of the crystalline lens with accommodation.

L F Garner1, G Smith.   

Abstract

The ocular dimensions and refraction of the eye were measured for accommodation stimulus levels of 0.0, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, and 8.0 D for 11 subjects aged 18 to 28 years, mean 21.2 +/- 2.62 years using keratometry, autorefraction, A-Scan ultrasonography, and video phakometry techniques. The subjects had refractive errors in the range + 0.50 to -4.25 D, mean -1.88 +/- 1.64 D. With the maximum level of accommodation the anterior chamber depth decreased by 0.23 +/- 0.09 mm, the lens thickness increased by 0.28 +/- 0.09 mm, and no significant differences were recorded in axial length or vitreous chamber depth. The radius of curvature of the anterior surface of the crystalline lens decreased from 11.54 +/- 1.27 to 6.59 +/- 0.97 mm and the posterior surface from -6.67 +/- 0.97 to -5.30 +/- 0.4 mm. We determined the equivalent refractive index to be 1.4277 +/- 0.0011, with no significant differences at different levels of accommodation. When the crystalline lens was modeled as a gradient refractive index (GRIN) structure with elliptical iso-indicial lines, the mean surface refractive index of the lens was 1.3859 +/- 0.0009 for an assumed central refractive index of 1.406. The power of the anterior surface of the lens increased from 4.38 +/- 0.49 to 7.59 +/- 0.34 D, the posterior surface increased from 7.67 +/- 1.28 to 9.32 +/- 0.64 D, and the GRIN power increased from 9.70 +/- 1.31 to 13.74 +/- 0.77 D for the maximum accommodative stimulus of 8.00 D. On the basis of the model used, a substantial part of the increase in power of the crystalline lens with accommodation resulted from the change in refractive index distribution within the lens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9097329     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199702000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  11 in total

1.  Spatially variant changes in lens power during ocular accommodation in a rhesus monkey eye.

Authors:  Abhiram S Vilupuru; Austin Roorda; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Contribution of the crystalline lens gradient refractive index to the accommodation amplitude in non-human primates: in vitro studies.

Authors:  Bianca M Maceo; Fabrice Manns; David Borja; Derek Nankivil; Stephen Uhlhorn; Esdras Arrieta; Arthur Ho; Robert C Augusteyn; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  OCT-based crystalline lens topography in accommodating eyes.

Authors:  Pablo Pérez-Merino; Miriam Velasco-Ocana; Eduardo Martinez-Enriquez; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Changes in crystalline lens radii of curvature and lens tilt and decentration during dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Patricia Rosales; Mark Wendt; Susana Marcos; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Influence of shape and gradient refractive index in the accommodative changes of spherical aberration in nonhuman primate crystalline lenses.

Authors:  Alberto de Castro; Judith Birkenfeld; Bianca Maceo; Fabrice Manns; Esdras Arrieta; Jean-Marie Parel; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Repeatability assessment of anterior segment biometric measurements under accommodative and nonaccommodative conditions using an anterior segment OCT.

Authors:  Noelia Martínez-Albert; Jose J Esteve-Taboada; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Refractive index measurement of the isolated crystalline lens using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Stephen R Uhlhorn; David Borja; Fabrice Manns; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Lens thickness with age and accommodation by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kathryn Richdale; Mark A Bullimore; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  [Measurement of accommodation using optical biometry].

Authors:  A Nurispahic; K Kotliar; I Lanzl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Variation of axial and oblique astigmatism with accommodation across the visual field.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.