Literature DB >> 9096967

Performance of an NIDDM screening questionnaire based on symptoms and risk factors.

J B Ruige1, J N de Neeling, P J Kostense, L M Bouter, R J Heine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate to what extent a short questionnaire on symptoms and risk factors can be used to identify people at increased risk for undiagnosed NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A general population sample of 2,364 Caucasian subjects, age 50-74 years, not known to have diabetes, completed a questionnaire on diabetes-related symptoms and risk factors. Subsequently, they underwent an oral glucose tolerance test. A backward stepwise multiple logistic regression was carried out with the absence or presence of newly detected diabetes as the dependent variable and the items from the questionnaire as the independent variables. The selected items were included in a new symptom risk questionnaire, which was evaluated in a different population sample of 786 subjects, age 45-74 years, not known to have diabetes and compared with existing questionnaires.
RESULTS: The newly developed symptom-risk questionnaire contains questions concerning the following items, which were independently and significantly (P < 0.05) associated with the presence of previously undiagnosed diabetes: pain during walking with need to slow down, shortness of breath when walking with people of the same age, frequent thirst, age, sex, obesity, parent or sibling with diabetes, use of antihypertensive drugs, and reluctance to use a bicycle for transportation. The 1993 American Diabetes Association questionnaire, the 1995 Herman et aL (17) questionnaire, and the newly developed symptom-risk questionnaire had sensitivities of 59, 72, and 72%; specificities of 57, 55, and 56%; positive predictive values of 5.6, 6.4, and 6.5%; and negative predictive values of 97, 98, and 98%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed symptom-risk questionnaire has good performance characteristics, and the advantage of a variable cutoff makes it a useful screening tool for NIDDM in general practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9096967     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  29 in total

Review 1.  Should we screen for type 2 diabetes? Evaluation against National Screening Committee criteria.

Authors:  N J Wareham; S J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

2.  Population-based stepwise screening for unrecognised Type 2 diabetes is ineffective in general practice despite reliable algorithms.

Authors:  J O Christensen; A Sandbaek; T Lauritzen; K Borch-Johnsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Hyperglycaemia and mortality from all causes and from cardiovascular disease in five populations of Asian origin.

Authors:  T Nakagami
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Evaluation of a risk factor scoring model in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in China population.

Authors:  Jian-jun Dong; Neng-jun Lou; Jia-jun Zhao; Zhong-wen Zhang; Lu-lu Qiu; Ying Zhou; Lin Liao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Diabetes-related symptoms and negative mood in participants of a targeted population-screening program for type 2 diabetes: The Hoorn Screening Study.

Authors:  Marcel C Adriaanse; Jacqueline M Dekker; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Jos W R Twisk; Giel Nijpels; Henk M van der Ploeg; Robert J Heine; Frank J Snoek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Strategies to identify adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Randomised controlled trial of intensive multifactorial treatment for cardiovascular risk in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: 1-year data from the ADDITION Netherlands study.

Authors:  Paul Gh Janssen; Kees J Gorter; Ronald P Stolk; Guy Ehm Rutten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  The relationship between HbA1c level, symptoms and self-rated health in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Anni B S Nielsen; Dorte Gannik; Volkert Siersma; Niels de Fine Olivarius
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Symptoms, signs and complications in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients, and their relationship to glycaemia, blood pressure and weight.

Authors:  T Drivsholm; N de Fine Olivarius; A B S Nielsen; V Siersma
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Three years follow-up of screen-detected diabetic and non-diabetic subjects: who is better off? The ADDITION Netherlands study.

Authors:  Paul G H Janssen; Kees J Gorter; Ronald P Stolk; Mehmet Akarsubasi; Guy E H M Rutten
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.