Literature DB >> 9096446

Effects of conventional vs. low-molecular-weight heparin on lipid profile in hemodialysis patients.

M S Elisaf1, N P Germanos, H T Bairaktari, M B Pappas, E I Koulouridis, K C Siamopoulos.   

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of death in hemodialysis patients and seems to be related, at least in part, to lipid abnormalities. It has been suggested that in these patients low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is superior to conventional heparin because it causes less side effects and has beneficial effects on lipid parameters. Our study was carried out to examine the long-term effects of the replacement of conventional heparin by LMWH on the lipoprotein profile in a large group of hemodialysis patients. A total of 76 patients aged 15-61 years receiving hemodialysis for 48 (range 10-169) months were studied. In all patients administration of LMWH was introduced in doses of 2,500-5,000 anti-factor Xa units for 12 months. Then, we randomly switched half of the patients back to conventional heparin for another 12 months, while the remaining patients continued to receive LMWH for 12 months. In the whole group of patients the use of LMWH instead of conventional heparin was followed by a significant decrease in serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and apoprotein B levels. The continued use of LMWH for another 12 months in half of the patients was followed by a further significant improvement in the lipid profile. In contrast, no significant changes in serum lipid parameters were observed in patients switched back to conventional heparin. In conclusion, the use of LMWH instead of conventional heparin for anticoagulation during hemodialysis is followed by an improvement in lipid profile, which is evident only after long-term treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9096446     DOI: 10.1159/000169090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Nephrol        ISSN: 0250-8095            Impact factor:   3.754


  13 in total

Review 1.  Unfractionated heparin for hemodialysis: still the best option.

Authors:  Robert E Cronin; Robert F Reilly
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 2.  Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its use in the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and in the prevention of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit during haemodialysis.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Lesley J Scott; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Enoxaparin vs. unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a randomized controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Jordan Kountchev; Markus Rauchenzauner; Nicola Schusterschitz; Hanno Ulmer; Andreas Mayr; Romuald Bellmann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Use and safety of unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jenny I Shen; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 5.  Tinzaparin sodium: a review of its pharmacology and clinical use in the prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Susan M Cheer; Christopher J Dunn; Rachel Foster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A multi-center, prospective, open-label, 8-week study of certoparin for anticoagulation during maintenance hemodialysis--the membrane study.

Authors:  Oliver Dorsch; Detlef H Krieter; Horst-Dieter Lemke; Stefan Fischer; Nima Melzer; Christian Sieder; Peter Bramlage; Job Harenberg
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  The impact of haemodialysis-associated variables on lipid profile in Egyptian haemodialysis population.

Authors:  H Abo-Zenah; A Sabry; A Farouk; N Abdelhalim; K El-Sayed; M Sobh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Lipoprotein lipase responds similarly to tinzaparin as to conventional heparin during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Dana Mahmood; Maria Grubbström; Lennart D I Lundberg; Gunilla Olivecrona; Thomas Olivecrona; Bernd G Stegmayr
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 9.  Efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin compared to unfractionated heparin for chronic outpatient hemodialysis in end stage renal disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha; Anita Ashok Kumar; Mansha Sethi; Rohit C Khanna; Samir Bipin Pancholy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  Clinical review: Patency of the circuit in continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Michael Joannidis; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.