Literature DB >> 9096208

In vivo packaging of bacteriophage lambda monomeric chromosomes.

L C Thomason1, D S Thaler, M M Stahl, F W Stahl.   

Abstract

There is an apparent paradox between the reported requirements for lambda DNA packaging in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, DNA concatemers are required for packaging. On the other hand, in vitro, packaging extracts can encapsidate either linear or circular monomeric lambda DNA. Perhaps cellular nucleases restrict the in vivo ability of monomers to package by degrading a free double chain end present as an intermediate in the packaging reaction. Consistent with this hypothesis, enhanced packaging of monomers was found in an ExoV- host. No additional enhancement was noted in a host also mutant for sbcB and sbcC. We isolated a mutant phage for which in vivo packaging of monomeric lambda chromosomes is increased about 10(3)-fold. The responsible mutation (plm1 for packages lambda monomers) was mapped to cro, sequenced, and found to cause a change from Ala29 to Ser in the alpha3 helix of Cro's DNA binding domain. Density transfer experiments showed that packaging of both plm1 and wild-type lambda was aided by allowing some DNA synthesis. However, the packaged chromosomes had not themselves undergone a full round of replication and therefore were not part of a canonical concatemer made by replication. Other tests showed that packaged phage had not been part of concatemers made by recombination or by annealing at cos. Our results with wild-type lambda also favor models in which two cos sites are needed for packaging, but these sites need not be in cis. In lambda plm1, replication intermediates may serve as substrates for encapsidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9096208     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  9 in total

1.  How long can bacteriophage λ change its mind?

Authors:  Szabolcs Semsey; Christopher Campion; Abdu Mohamed; Sine Lo Svenningsen
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2015-01-30

2.  Annealing vs. invasion in phage lambda recombination.

Authors:  M M Stahl; L Thomason; A R Poteete; T Tarkowski; A Kuzminov; F W Stahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Roles for lambda Orf and Escherichia coli RecO, RecR and RecF in lambda recombination.

Authors:  J A Sawitzke; F W Stahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Physical and Functional Characterization of a Viral Genome Maturation Complex.

Authors:  Teng-Chieh Yang; David Ortiz; Qin Yang; Rolando W De Angelis; Saurarshi J Sanyal; Carlos E Catalano
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Recombination promoted by DNA viruses: phage λ to herpes simplex virus.

Authors:  Sandra K Weller; James A Sawitzke
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  Bacteriophage SPP1 Chu is an alkaline exonuclease in the SynExo family of viral two-component recombinases.

Authors:  Trina S Vellani; Richard S Myers
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  Recombinational repair of DNA damage in Escherichia coli and bacteriophage lambda.

Authors:  A Kuzminov
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Double-strand-break repair recombination in Escherichia coli: physical evidence for a DNA replication mechanism in vivo.

Authors:  M R Motamedi; S K Szigety; S M Rosenberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Single-event analysis of the packaging of bacteriophage T7 DNA concatemers in vitro.

Authors:  M Sun; D Louie; P Serwer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.