Literature DB >> 9095017

Emergency medicine research consent form readability assessment.

T J Mader1, S J Playe.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of education necessary to understand informed consent documents used to enroll subjects in emergency medicine research.
METHODS: The directors of 96 accredited emergency medicine residency programs were asked to provide copies of research consent forms approved for patient enrollment at their facilities. A computer program was used to evaluate the readability of the documents submitted. The consent forms were stratified by degree of risk to the subject and compared with the use of ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS: Ninety-four informed consent documents were received from 45 program directors. After exclusion of 6 forms, 88 were analyzed using the software program RightWriter 5.0. The mean readability index (years of education needed to understand the content) was 10. The length and complexity of the consent forms increased as risk to the subject increased (P = .03).
CONCLUSION: Informed consent documents used in emergency medicine research may be too complex for the average patient to understand. A positive correlation exists between protocol risk and consent from complexity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9095017     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70229-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  12 in total

1.  English-language competency of self-declared English-speaking Hispanic patients using written tests of health literacy.

Authors:  Leslie S Zun; Tania Sadoun; LaVonne Downey
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Comprehension and informed consent: assessing the effect of a short consent form.

Authors:  Leanne Stunkel; Meredith Benson; Louise McLellan; Ninet Sinaii; Gabriella Bedarida; Ezekiel Emanuel; Christine Grady
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

3.  The readability of information and consent forms in clinical research in France.

Authors:  Véronique Ménoni; Noël Lucas; Jean François Leforestier; Jérôme Dimet; François Doz; Gilles Chatellier; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Hélène Chappuy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Testing of a verbal assessment tool of English proficiency for use in the healthcare setting.

Authors:  La Vonne A Downey; Leslie Zun
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Readability of the written study information in pediatric research in France.

Authors:  Véronique Ménoni; Noël Lucas; Jean-François Leforestier; François Doz; Gilles Chatellier; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigain; Carole Giraud; Jean-Marc Tréluyer; Hélène Chappuy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Protecting vulnerable research subjects in critical care trials: enhancing the informed consent process and recommendations for safeguards.

Authors:  Henry Silverman
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.925

7.  A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: is longer better?

Authors:  Kenji Matsui; Reidar K Lie; Tanvir C Turin; Yoshikuni Kita
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.211

8.  Informed consent for clinical trials in acute coronary syndromes and stroke following the European Clinical Trials Directive: investigators' experiences and attitudes.

Authors:  Piotr Iwanowski; Andrzej Budaj; Anna Członkowska; Wojciech Wasek; Beata Kozłowska-Boszko; Urszula Oledzka; Wojciech Masełbas
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Can patient decision aids help people make good decisions about participating in clinical trials? A study protocol.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Alison Lott; Dean A Fergusson; Kaveh G Shojania; Jonathan Kimmelman; Raphael Saginur
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Sense and readability: participant information sheets for research studies.

Authors:  Liam Ennis; Til Wykes
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.