Literature DB >> 9093797

Comparison of aceclofenac with piroxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

M Peréz Busquier1, E Calero, M Rodríguez, P Castellon Arce, A Bermudez, L F Linares, J Mesa, C Ffernandez Crisostomos, C Garcia, A Garcia Lopez, A Valenzuela, A Povedano, S Garcia Perez, M A Lopez, R Caliz, F Garcia Villalba, M Cano, F Gines Martinez, J Gonzalez, M A Caracuel, R Roldan, M Guzman Ubeda, A Gonzalez, I L Marenco de la Fuente, M Alepuz Pou.   

Abstract

A multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel group study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy and safety of aceclofenac (123 patients, 100 mg twice daily) in comparison to piroxicam (117 patients, 20 mg once daily and placebo once daily) in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The treatment period of two months was preceded by a washout period of one week duration. On completion of the study, patients in both aceclofenac and piroxicam-treated groups exhibited significant improvement in pain intensity and functional capacity of the affected knee, as represented by the Osteoarthritis Severity Index (OSI) (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001 respectively). This was further substantiated following the patient's assessment of pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), in which significant improvements were demonstrated at all time points for each treatment group (p < 0.001). Although both treatment groups showed a significant improvement in all investigator's clinical assessments (functional exploration of the knee, knee flexion and extension (EXT)), there were no significant differences between the groups. There was, however, a more rapid improvement in knee flexion in the aceclofenac group after 15 days of treatment. Both aceclofenac and piroxicam were well tolerated by patients, the most commonly reported adverse events being gastrointestinal, although their incidence was low. Only 24 patients on aceclofenac, as opposed to 33 on piroxicam complained of dyspepsia, epigastralgia and pyrosis. While 7 patients in each group were withdrawn because of adverse events, only one patient with piroxicam was withdrawn because of severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Twice as many reports of fecal blood loss were made in the piroxicam group in comparison to the aceclofenac group. In summary, this study confirms the therapeutic efficacy of aceclofenac and suggests that it is a well-tolerated alternative NSAID to piroxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9093797     DOI: 10.1007/bf02247844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  18 in total

1.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  D T Felson
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Indexes of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Validation--value in comparison with other assessment tests.

Authors:  M G Lequesne; C Mery; M Samson; P Gerard
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol Suppl       Date:  1987

Review 4.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy. Recognition and response.

Authors:  S H Roth; R E Bennett
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-12

5.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in relation to major upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  D W Kaufman; J P Kelly; J E Sheehan; A Laszlo; B E Wiholm; L Alfredsson; R S Koff; S Shapiro
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  A two-year, placebo-controlled trial of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy in osteoarthritis of the knee joint.

Authors:  P Dieppe; J Cushnaghan; M K Jasani; F McCrae; I Watt
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1993-07

7.  Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  L A García Rodríguez; H Jick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-03-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  NSAID and osteoarthritis--help or hindrance?

Authors:  P M Brooks; S R Potter; W W Buchanan
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.666

Review 9.  Cartilage metabolism and anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E V Hess; J H Herman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1986-11-28       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Evaluation of the analgesic activity and tolerability of aceclofenac in the treatment of post-episiotomy pain.

Authors:  P G Movilia
Journal:  Drugs Exp Clin Res       Date:  1989
View more
  4 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of aceclofenac in osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Parvati B Patel; Tejas K Patel
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-03-01

Review 2.  Aceclofenac: a reappraisal of its use in the management of pain and rheumatic disease.

Authors:  M Dooley; C M Spencer; C J Dunn
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Aceclofenac Controlled Release in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A 4-week, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study.

Authors:  Young-Wan Moon; Seung-Baik Kang; Tae-Kyun Kim; Myung-Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-27

4.  Pharmacokinetics and Anti-Gastric Ulceration Activity of Oral Administration of Aceclofenac and Esomeprazole in Rats.

Authors:  Tae Hwan Kim; Subindra Kazi Thapa; Da Young Lee; Seung Eun Chung; Jun Young Lim; Hyeon Myeong Jeong; Chang Ho Song; Youn-Woong Choi; Sang-Min Cho; Kyu-Yeol Nam; Won-Ho Kang; Soyoung Shin; Beom Soo Shin
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 6.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.