| Literature DB >> 9092230 |
M Zwaan1, H Lorch, C Kagel, H Wenk, G Schwieder, J Eberhard, G Müller, H D Weiss.
Abstract
Heavily injured patients, patients who underwent operations on pelvis, hips, abdomen or malignoma surgery, as well as gynaecology patients suffering from malignoma or previous deep femoral vein thrombosis in connection with pregnancy or obesity are at risk to suffer from pulmonary embolism with potentially lethal course. In a retrospective study we evaluated the advantage of the prophylactic use of temporary vena cava filters and their side effects. The indications were 18 cases of surgery, with known iliacal vein or cava thrombosis, 3 cases of pregnancy thromboses, and 1 high-dose heparinisation after acute pulmonary embolism without lysis. Additionally a postoperative lysis therapy was performed due to a life-threatening pulmonary embolism in 1 patient. 1 Cook filter (transfemoral), 3 Angiocor filters (transbrachial), and 19 Antheor filters (3 transjugular, 5 transfemoral, 11 transbrachial) were implanted. In these patients no clinically visible pulmonary embolism occurred under therapy, 3 thrombi were detected in the filter. Complications were caused either by the underlying therapy alone (1 lethal outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery), by the combination of therapy and cava filter implantation (1 case of arm haematoma, 1 ascending thrombosis) or by filter implantation alone (2 cases of v. subclavia thrombosis, 1 dislocation, 1 basket rupture). Since temporary cava filters have no secondary complications per se, their use seems justified as long as there is strict indication including presence of iliacal vein or cava thrombosis and risk of thrombi mobilisation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1996 PMID: 9092230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Zentralbl Chir ISSN: 0044-409X Impact factor: 0.942