PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: A retrospective study reports the evolution of patients treated for dislocation of one or several of the four medial carpometacarpal joints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five of twenty-six patients, the dislocations were undiagnosed in emergency. Twenty-five dislocations were dorsal. A patient presented a divergent dislocation of the four medial metacarpals proximal ends. The mean age was 25-30 years. Twenty-six patients were treated: ten by closed reduction and sixteen by open reduction. Stabilization by oblique K-wire pining was used in twenty-four cases. Twenty patients were followed for an average of fourty-one months. Six patients were lost for follow-up. Two patients had an an ulnar nerve injury. In eighteen cases, dislocation was associated with avulsion fracture of the involved bone. Eleven fractures of the distal carpal row was reported. RESULTS: The results were assessed by the range of wrist and fingers motion, grip strength, pain and deformity. Three patients had a limited range of wrist motion, five patients had a limited range of fingers motion. Six patients had a loss of fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joint motion. Eight patients had an excellent grip strength. Four patients were pain free and fourteen had climatic pain, or after strenuous use of the hand. Eleven had no deformity or limited prominence and three a disabling deformity. Results were rated good in thirteen cases, fair in three and poor in four. DISCUSSION: Dislocation or fracture-dislocation of the carpometacarpal joints are uncommon injuries. The diagnosis can be easily missed. The authors recommend closed or open reduction but constant fixation by pins and immobilization in a plaster cast. In this study, the majority of results was good when no serious injuries were associated and when reductions were stabilized with k-wires. One out of four poor results had been treated by closed reduction without k-wires, the three others were due to associated injuries.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: A retrospective study reports the evolution of patients treated for dislocation of one or several of the four medial carpometacarpal joints. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five of twenty-six patients, the dislocations were undiagnosed in emergency. Twenty-five dislocations were dorsal. A patient presented a divergent dislocation of the four medial metacarpals proximal ends. The mean age was 25-30 years. Twenty-six patients were treated: ten by closed reduction and sixteen by open reduction. Stabilization by oblique K-wire pining was used in twenty-four cases. Twenty patients were followed for an average of fourty-one months. Six patients were lost for follow-up. Two patients had an an ulnar nerve injury. In eighteen cases, dislocation was associated with avulsion fracture of the involved bone. Eleven fractures of the distal carpal row was reported. RESULTS: The results were assessed by the range of wrist and fingers motion, grip strength, pain and deformity. Three patients had a limited range of wrist motion, five patients had a limited range of fingers motion. Six patients had a loss of fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joint motion. Eight patients had an excellent grip strength. Four patients were pain free and fourteen had climatic pain, or after strenuous use of the hand. Eleven had no deformity or limited prominence and three a disabling deformity. Results were rated good in thirteen cases, fair in three and poor in four. DISCUSSION: Dislocation or fracture-dislocation of the carpometacarpal joints are uncommon injuries. The diagnosis can be easily missed. The authors recommend closed or open reduction but constant fixation by pins and immobilization in a plaster cast. In this study, the majority of results was good when no serious injuries were associated and when reductions were stabilized with k-wires. One out of four poor results had been treated by closed reduction without k-wires, the three others were due to associated injuries.