Literature DB >> 9091328

Practice patterns among reproductive endocrinologists: the infertility evaluation.

I Z Glatstein1, B L Harlow, M D Hornstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine how board-certified reproductive endocrinologists vary in their approach to the clinical tests performed on the infertile couple.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study to assess differences in the approach to evaluating the infertile couple.
SETTING: A population-based national survey. PARTICIPANT(S): United States board-certified reproductive endocrinologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The frequency of clinical tests and evaluation procedures by physician age, sex, size and setting of practice, institutional affiliation, and geographic location. RESULT(S): The overall response rate was 84%. Although the majority of practitioners routinely order a semen analysis (99.9%), an assessment of ovulation (98%), a hysterosalpingogram, (HSG; 96%), laparoscopy (89%), and a postcoital test (PCT, 79%), there was less agreement regarding hormonal testing (range, 22% [LH] to 66% [PRL]), use of pelvic ultrasounds (55%), hysteroscopy (53%), cervical cultures (range, 24% to 54%), and antisperm antibody testing (24%). Compared with male colleagues, female physicians order two to three times more cervical cultures and endometrial biopsies. Serum hormonal testing was two to three times more commonly ordered by younger (< 40 years) compared with older physicians, and physicians in private practice twice as frequently ordered hormonal testing, cervical cultures, PCTs, and antisperm antibody studies compared with their academic-affiliated colleagues. Western U.S. physicians order hormonal tests and cervical cultures 50% less often than their midwest and eastern counterparts. CONCLUSION(S): Trained specialists rely heavily on five "traditional" infertility tests: semen analysis, an assessment of ovulation, HSG, laparoscopy, and PCT. With regard to additional modes of testing, there is marked variability by physician sex, age, type of practice, and geographic location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9091328     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80067-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Association between teenage pregnancy rates and the age and sex of general practitioners: cross sectional survey in Trent 1994-7.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; J Allen; M Pringle; D Ebdon; M McPhearson; D Churchill; S Bradley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-25

2.  How members of the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility and Society of Reproductive Surgeons evaluate, define, and manage hydrosalpinges.

Authors:  Kenan Omurtag; Natalia M Grindler; Kimberly A Roehl; Gordon Wright Bates; Angeline N Beltsos; Randall R Odem; Emily S Jungheim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Serum prolactin and TSH in an in vitro fertilization population: is there a link between fertilization and thyroid function?

Authors:  D W Cramer; P M Sluss; R D Powers; P McShane; E S Ginsburgs; M D Hornstein; A F Vitonis; R L Barbieri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Subclinical elevations of thyroid-stimulating hormone and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Michalakis; Tolga B Mesen; Lynae M Brayboy; Bo Yu; Kevin S Richter; Michael Levy; Eric Widra; James H Segars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Diagnostic laparoscopy in primary and secondary infertility.

Authors:  Y Hovav; E Hornstein; M Almagor; C Yaffe
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Utilization of infertility services: how much does money matter?

Authors:  J Farley Ordovensky Staniec; Natalie J Webb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.