OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of the Omron HEM 705 CP oscillometric device for the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-five pregnant women with a wide range of blood pressures, and 43 women with pre-eclampsia. METHODS: Evaluation was carried out according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, incorporating criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). RESULTS: Mean differences (device minus observer) for systolic blood pressure were -0.9 mmHg (SD 10) in normal pregnancy, and -2 mmHg (SD 10) in the women with pre-eclampsia. For diastolic blood pressure, Korotkoff phase V, the differences were -1.5 mmHg (SD 10), and -8 mmHg (SD 8) respectively; i.e. the device consistently under-read the diastolic blood pressure in pre-eclamptic women by a mean of 8 mmHg when compared with conventional sphygmomanometry. Korotkoff phase IV could not be accurately reproduced. According to the British Hypertension Society grading criteria, the device reached a 'B' grading in the 85 pregnant women. In pre-eclampsia only a 'C' grade was reached for systolic blood pressure, and 'D' grade for diastolic blood pressure. Accuracy criteria stipulated by the AAMI were not met in any situation. CONCLUSION: The Omron HEM 705 CP does not reach acceptable accuracy criteria for blood pressure measurement when compared with trained observers in women with pre-eclampsia, as judged by the British Hypertension Society Protocol. It also failed to meet the AAMI criteria, although the methodology stipulated by the AAMI may not be applicable to a pregnancy population.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of the Omron HEM 705 CP oscillometric device for the measurement of blood pressure in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. SETTING: Two teaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-five pregnant women with a wide range of blood pressures, and 43 women with pre-eclampsia. METHODS: Evaluation was carried out according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, incorporating criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). RESULTS: Mean differences (device minus observer) for systolic blood pressure were -0.9 mmHg (SD 10) in normal pregnancy, and -2 mmHg (SD 10) in the women with pre-eclampsia. For diastolic blood pressure, Korotkoff phase V, the differences were -1.5 mmHg (SD 10), and -8 mmHg (SD 8) respectively; i.e. the device consistently under-read the diastolic blood pressure in pre-eclamptic women by a mean of 8 mmHg when compared with conventional sphygmomanometry. Korotkoff phase IV could not be accurately reproduced. According to the British Hypertension Society grading criteria, the device reached a 'B' grading in the 85 pregnant women. In pre-eclampsia only a 'C' grade was reached for systolic blood pressure, and 'D' grade for diastolic blood pressure. Accuracy criteria stipulated by the AAMI were not met in any situation. CONCLUSION: The Omron HEM 705 CP does not reach acceptable accuracy criteria for blood pressure measurement when compared with trained observers in women with pre-eclampsia, as judged by the British Hypertension Society Protocol. It also failed to meet the AAMI criteria, although the methodology stipulated by the AAMI may not be applicable to a pregnancy population.
Authors: Natalie A Bello; Jonathan J Woolley; Kirsten Lawrence Cleary; Louise Falzon; Bruce S Alpert; Suzanne Oparil; Gary Cutter; Ronald Wapner; Paul Muntner; Alan T Tita; Daichi Shimbo Journal: Hypertension Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Walter G Espeche; Martin R Salazar; Julián Minetto; Carlos E Leiva Sisnieguez; Gustavo Cerri; Eduardo Balbín; Rodolfo N Stavile; Patricia Carrera Ramos; Adelaida Soria; Claudia Santillan; Florencia Grassi; Soledad Torres; Horacio A Carbajal Journal: J Hum Hypertens Date: 2022-10-12 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Annemarie De Greeff; Elodie Lawley; John Anthony; David R Hall; Wilhelm Steyn; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan Journal: Pregnancy Hypertens Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 2.899
Authors: Hannah L Nathan; Paul T Seed; Natasha L Hezelgrave; Annemarie De Greeff; Elodie Lawley; Frances Conti-Ramsden; John Anthony; Wilhelm Steyn; David R Hall; Lucy C Chappell; Andrew H Shennan Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 7.664
Authors: Lise Loerup; Rebecca M Pullon; Jacqueline Birks; Susannah Fleming; Lucy H Mackillop; Stephen Gerry; Peter J Watkinson Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Uchechukwu C Ukoh; Fortune A Ujunwa; Uzoamaka Vivian Muoneke; Pius C Manyike; Clifford O Okike; Bede C Ibe Journal: Ann Afr Med Date: 2020 Jan-Mar